Literature DB >> 12409572

Frequency of visualization and thickness of normal appendix at nonenhanced helical CT.

Ofer Benjaminov1, Mostafa Atri, Paul Hamilton, Daniel Rappaport.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the frequency of visualization, thickness, and features of the normal appendix at nonenhanced helical computed tomography (CT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three radiologists blinded to patient surgical history retrospectively reviewed CT scans obtained for renal colic assessment in 187 consecutive patients. No contrast material was administered. The frequency of visualization and the two-wall thickness of normal appendices were recorded. Interobserver agreement and effect of adequacy of intraperitoneal fat on identification of the appendix were assessed.
RESULTS: The prevalence of appendectomy was 10.7% (20 of 187 patients). The means for the three reviewers' sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of visualization of normal appendix were 79% (CI: 73%, 84%), 90% (CI: 78%, 96%), 98% (CI: 97%, 99%), 34% (CI: 22%, 47%), and 80% (CI: 74%, 86%), respectively. There was no significant difference among the three reviewers (P >.05) according to conditional logistic regression and exact McNemar test results. For all reviewers, the frequency of appendix visualization was significantly lower in patients with less intraperitoneal fat (P =.01-.001, chi(2) test). The mean thickness of normal appendix if no intraluminal content was visualized was 6.6 mm +/- 1.0 (SD), and the mean thickness, excluding visualized intraluminal content, was 3.6 mm +/- 0.8. The nonweighted kappa value for interobserver agreement for normal appendix visualization was 0.69-0.75 among the three reviewers, which indicated good to excellent agreement.
CONCLUSION: Most normal appendices are seen at nonenhanced helical CT. The thickness of normal appendix, when the content is not recognizable, overlaps the values currently used to diagnose appendicitis at CT. Copyright RSNA, 2002

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12409572     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2252011551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  20 in total

1.  Single-site versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: comparison of short-term operative outcomes.

Authors:  Min-Soo Cho; Byung Soh Min; Young-Ki Hong; Woo-Jung Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Multidetector-row CT of the appendix in healthy adults.

Authors:  Pamela T Johnson; John Eng; Carolyn J Moore; Karen M Horton; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2006-07-04

3.  Predictors of appendicitis on computed tomography among cases with borderline appendix size.

Authors:  Atalie C Thompson; Eric W Olcott; Peter D Poullos; R Brooke Jeffrey; Matthew O Thompson; Jarrett Rosenberg; Lewis K Shin
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2015-02-17

4.  An unusual manifestation of acute appendicitis with left flank pain.

Authors:  Roland Talanow
Journal:  J Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2008-07-01

5.  Visualization of the normal appendix with MR enterography in children.

Authors:  Arzu Kovanlikaya; Daniel Rosenbaum; Madhu Mazumdar; Allison Dunning; Paula W Brill
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-03-21

6.  Acute appendicitis: relationships between CT-determined severities and serum white blood cell counts and C-reactive protein levels.

Authors:  H C Kim; D M Yang; C M Lee; W Jin; D H Nam; J Y Song; J Y Kim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Inter-observer agreement for abdominal CT in unselected patients with acute abdominal pain.

Authors:  Adrienne van Randen; Wytze Laméris; C Yung Nio; Anje M Spijkerboer; Mark A Meier; Charlotte Tutein Nolthenius; Frank Smithuis; Patrick M Bossuyt; Marja A Boermeester; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  The equivocal appendix at CT: prevalence in a control population.

Authors:  Emily M Webb; Zhen J Wang; Fergus V Coakley; Liina Poder; Antonio C Westphalen; Benjamin M Yeh
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2009-07-14

9.  Profiles of US and CT imaging features with a high probability of appendicitis.

Authors:  A van Randen; W Laméris; H W van Es; W ten Hove; W H Bouma; M S van Leeuwen; E M van Keulen; V P M van der Hulst; O D Henneman; P M Bossuyt; M A Boermeester; J Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  [Screening in cardiovascular diseases].

Authors:  H Kramer; S Weckbach; G van Kaick; M F Reiser; S O Schoenberg
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.