Literature DB >> 12409570

CT colonography: multiobserver diagnostic performance.

Elizabeth G McFarland1, Thomas K Pilgram, James A Brink, Ronan A McDermott, Cynthia V Santillan, Patrick W Brady, Jay P Heiken, Dennis M Balfe, Leonard B Weinstock, Erik P Thyssen, Benjamin Littenberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate multiobserver diagnostic performance and reader agreement for colorectal polyp detection in a well-characterized cohort of patients with increased number of polyps, compared with an average-risk patient, with colonoscopy as the reference standard.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 70 patients suspected of having polyps was examined with spiral computed tomographic (CT) colonography, with colonoscopy performed the same day. After air insufflation per rectum, supine and prone images were obtained with single-detector row CT (5-mm collimation, 8-mm table increment, 2-mm reconstruction interval). Images were analyzed independently by four experienced abdominal radiologists using two-dimensional multiplanar reformation followed by selective use of three-dimensional endoscopic volume-rendered images. Data were analyzed both per polyp and per patient.
RESULTS: Analysis per polyp demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 0.68 for lesions 10 mm or larger (n = 40), with 75% agreement among the four readers. Analysis per patient demonstrated improved detection and agreement, with a pooled sensitivity of 0.88 for patients with polyps or cancers 10 mm or larger (n = 28), with 94% agreement. When sensitivity and receiver operating characteristic analyses were analyzed per polyp size threshold, results among readers converged and peaked at polyp diameters of approximately 10 mm.
CONCLUSION: In this patient cohort, diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement with single-detector row CT colonography was sufficient for detection of patients with lesions 10 mm or larger, with more variable results for smaller polyps. Copyright RSNA, 2002

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12409570     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2252011625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  13 in total

1.  The virtuosity of virtuality or how real is virtual colonography.

Authors:  H Herfarth; A G Schreyer
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  CT colonography: effect of experience and training on reader performance.

Authors:  Stuart A Taylor; Steve Halligan; David Burling; Simon Morley; Paul Bassett; Wendy Atkin; Clive I Bartram
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Screening for colon cancer.

Authors:  J P Heiken
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 3.909

4.  Efficient computerized polyp detection for CT colonography.

Authors:  Hong Li; Benoit Pineau; Peter Santago
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  CT colonography interpretation times: effect of reader experience, fatigue, and scan findings in a multi-centre setting.

Authors:  David Burling; Steve Halligan; Douglas G Altman; Wendy Atkin; Clive Bartram; Helen Fenlon; Andrea Laghi; Jaap Stoker; Stuart Taylor; Roger Frost; Guido Dessey; Melinda De Villiers; Jasper Florie; Shane Foley; Lesley Honeyfield; Riccardo Iannaccone; Teresa Gallo; Clive Kay; Philippe Lefere; Andrew Lowe; Filipo Mangiapane; Jesse Marrannes; Emmanuele Neri; Giulia Nieddu; David Nicholson; Alan O'Hare; Sante Ori; Benedetta Politi; Martin Poulus; Daniele Regge; Lisa Renaut; Velauthan Rudralingham; Saverio Signoretta; Paola Vagli; Victor Van der Hulst; Jane Williams-Butt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Current status of CT colonography.

Authors:  Suzanne M Frentz; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Computed tomographic colonography: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2003-10-01

Review 8.  CT colonography: over two decades from discovery to practice.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Judy Yee; C Daniel Johnson
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-03

9.  Computed tomography colonography (virtual colonoscopy): climax of a new era of validation and transition into community practice.

Authors:  Jacob Thomas; Jeffrey Carenza; Elizabeth McFarland
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-08

10.  Computed tomography colonography for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Virendra Tewari; Deepali Tewari; Frank G Gress
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2013-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.