Literature DB >> 12408541

Preimplantation social sexing: a problem of proportionality and decision making.

J Egozcue1.   

Abstract

Sex selection by sperm sorting seems ethically acceptable for social reasons. Sex selection after preimplantation embryo sexing results in the use of non-trivial means (discard healthy embryos) to fulfill a trivial desire. In this case, proportionality between means and ends is missing, and cultural reasons should not be accepted to justify its use.

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh：

Year:  2002        PMID： 12408541      PMCID： PMC3455546          DOI： 10.1023/a:1016824009521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN： 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  10 in total

1.  ESHRE Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis Consortium: data collection III (May 2001).

Authors: 
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Preimplantation sex selection for family balancing in India.

Authors:  A Malpani; A Malpani; D Modi
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  The place of 'social sexing' in medicine and science.

Authors:  Pierre F Ray; Arnold Munnich; Israël Nisand; René Frydman; Michel Vekemans; Stéphane Viville
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 4.  Preconception gender selection for nonmedical reasons.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Efficiency of MicroSort flow cytometry for producing sperm populations enriched in X- or Y-chromosome haplotypes: a blind trial assessed by double and triple colour fluorescent in-situ hybridization.

Authors:  F Vidal; E F Fugger; J Blanco; K Keyvanfar; V Català; M Norton; W B Hazelrigg; S H Black; G Levinson; J Egozcue; J D Schulman
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Sex selection: why not?

Authors:  J Egozcue
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Sexing human spermatozoa to control sex ratios at birth is now a reality.

Authors:  R G Edwards; H K Beard
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  The one hundred million missing females are dead: let it happen never again.

Authors:  M F Fathalla
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.561

9.  Gender preselection in humans? Flow cytometric separation of X and Y spermatozoa for the prevention of X-linked diseases.

Authors:  L A Johnson; G R Welch; K Keyvanfar; A Dorfmann; E F Fugger; J D Schulman
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification.

Authors:  A H Handyside; E H Kontogianni; K Hardy; R M Winston
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-04-19       Impact factor: 49.962
  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Social sex selection and the balance of the sexes: empirical evidence from Germany, the UK, and the US.

Authors:  E Dahl; M Beutel; B Brosig; S Grüssner; Y Stöbel-Richter; H-R Tinneberg; Elmar Brähler
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-09-17       Impact factor: 3.412
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.