Literature DB >> 12408378

Predictors of sensitivity of clinical breast examination (CBE).

Nina Oestreicher1, Emily White, Constance D Lehman, Margaret T Mandelson, Peggy L Porter, Stephen H Taplin.   

Abstract

Clinical breast examination (CBE) is one of the most common breast cancer screening modalities, but factors that affect its sensitivity are not well understood. We examined the association between CBE sensitivity and tumor, breast and personal characteristics among members of a managed care organization's Breast Cancer Screening Program (BCSP). The study population was 468 screened women 40 years and older diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between 1988 and 1994 within 1 year of a screening CBE. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the likelihood of a true positive versus a false negative CBE result, after adjustment for age, body weight and tumor size. CBE sensitivity increased with larger tumor size (17% for tumors < or = 0.5 cm and 58% for tumors > or = 2.1 cm, adjusted p for trend < 0.001) and decreased with higher body weight (48 and 23% for the lowest and highest quartiles, adjusted p for trend < 0.001). CBE was more sensitive in Asian women compared to white women (88% v.s. 35%, adjusted p = 0.04) and in current users of estrogen and progesterone combination therapy compared to never/former users (52% v.s. 33%, adjusted p = 0.08). There was an inverted U-shaped association between age and CBE sensitivity (40-49: 26%, 50-59: 48%, 60-69: 36%, 70-79: 33%, 80+: 18%, significant for oldest and youngest groups v.s. age 50-59 years). These findings suggest certain groups of women, for example, obese women and younger women, receive less benefit from CBE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12408378     DOI: 10.1023/a:1020280623807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  11 in total

1.  Variation in Breast Cancer-Risk Factor Associations by Method of Detection: Results From a Series of Case-Control Studies.

Authors:  Brian L Sprague; Ronald E Gangnon; John M Hampton; Kathleen M Egan; Linda J Titus; Karla Kerlikowske; Patrick L Remington; Polly A Newcomb; Amy Trentham-Dietz
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 2.  Advances in breast cancer screening modalities and status of global screening programs.

Authors:  Chenyu Luo; Le Wang; Yuhan Zhang; Ming Lu; Bin Lu; Jie Cai; Hongda Chen; Min Dai
Journal:  Chronic Dis Transl Med       Date:  2022-05-25

Review 3.  Screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Katrina Armstrong; Constance D Lehman; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Mechanical imaging of the breast.

Authors:  Vladimir Egorov; Armen P Sarvazyan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions by mechanical imaging.

Authors:  Vladimir Egorov; Thomas Kearney; Stanley B Pollak; Chand Rohatgi; Noune Sarvazyan; Suren Airapetian; Stephanie Browning; Armen Sarvazyan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Breast Medical Tactile Examiners (MTEs): A Prospective Pilot Study.

Authors:  Michael P Lux; Julius Emons; Mayada R Bani; Marius Wunderle; Charlotte Sell; Caroline Preuss; Claudia Rauh; Sebastian M Jud; Felix Heindl; Hanna Langemann; Thomas Geyer; Anna-Lisa Brandl; Carolin C Hack; Werner Adler; Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland; Matthias W Beckmann; Peter A Fasching; Paul Gass
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Identifying suspected breast cancer: development and validation of a clinical prediction rule.

Authors:  Colin McCowan; Peter T Donnan; John Dewar; Alastair Thompson; Tom Fahey
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Specificity of clinical breast examination in community practice.

Authors:  Joshua J Fenton; Sharon J Rolnick; Emily L Harris; Mary B Barton; William E Barlow; Lisa M Reisch; Lisa J Herrinton; Ann M Geiger; Suzanne W Fletcher; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Assessment of Adaptive Breast Cancer Screening Policies for Improved Mortality Reduction in Low to Middle Income Countries

Authors:  Baban Wagh; Ramesh Chaluvarayaswamy; Debnath Pal
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2017-09-27

10.  Cost-effective screening for breast cancer worldwide: current state and future directions.

Authors:  A Sarvazyan; V Egorov; J S Son; C S Kaufman
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2008-07-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.