Literature DB >> 12407172

An examination of physiological mechanisms underlying the frequency-doubling illusion.

Andrew J R White1, Hao Sun, William H Swanson, Barry B Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The frequency-doubling illusion is an apparent doubling of spatial frequency when a sinusoidal grating is modulated rapidly in temporal counterphase. It has been proposed that the illusion arises from a spatially nonlinear ganglion cell class. The current study reexamines this possibility and investigates other mechanisms that may underlie the illusion.
METHODS: Responses of macaque magnocellular (MC) retinal ganglion cells were recorded to counterphase-modulated sinusoidal gratings of various spatial frequencies, and linearity of spatial summation was assessed. Human psychophysical thresholds were measured for a variety of phase discrimination and matching tasks.
RESULTS: Consistent with lateral geniculate recordings reported by other authors, no evidence was found of a separate nonlinear (M(y)) MC cell class. The small, spatially nonlinear responses found were least at the low spatial frequencies used in clinical testing. Further analysis showed that no spatially modulated signal can be expected from the nonlinear response of a ganglion cell; the nonlinearity of spatial summation gives a doubled response in time but not across space. Psychophysical performance was consistent with an inability to distinguish the temporal phase of counterphase-modulated gratings when the illusion occurs. From 4 to 40 Hz, the zero-crossings of the modulated sinusoidal grating provided a spatial cue and were matched to comparison patterns at twice the stimulus spatial frequency.
CONCLUSIONS: These results are inconsistent with the hypothesis that spatially nonlinear (M(y)) retinal ganglion cells are the physiological substrate of the frequency-doubling illusion. A cortical loss of temporal phase discrimination may be the principle cause of the illusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12407172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  45 in total

1.  African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES): III. Ancestry differences in visual function in healthy eyes.

Authors:  Lyne Racette; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Christopher A Girkin; Linda M Zangwill; Sonia Jain; Lida M Becerra; Felipe A Medeiros; Christopher Bowd; Robert N Weinreb; Catherine Boden; Pamela A Sample
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-05

2.  [Importance of flicker contrast tests in functional glaucoma diagnostics].

Authors:  K Göbel; C M Poloschek; C Erb; M Bach
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Frequency-doubling technology and retinal measurements with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in preperimetric glaucoma.

Authors:  Takafumi Hirashima; Masanori Hangai; Masayuki Nukada; Noriko Nakano; Satoshi Morooka; Tadamichi Akagi; Atsushi Nonaka; Nagahisa Yoshimura
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Responses of primate retinal ganglion cells to perimetric stimuli.

Authors:  William H Swanson; Hao Sun; Barry B Lee; Dingcai Cao
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Topography of the frequency doubling perimetry visual field compared with that of short wavelength and achromatic automated perimetry visual fields.

Authors:  J Landers; A Sharma; I Goldberg; S Graham
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Linearity can account for the similarity among conventional, frequency-doubling, and gabor-based perimetric tests in the glaucomatous macula.

Authors:  Hao Sun; Mitchell W Dul; William H Swanson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Suppressive surrounds and contrast gain in magnocellular-pathway retinal ganglion cells of macaque.

Authors:  Samuel G Solomon; Barry B Lee; Hao Sun
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Macaque ganglion cell responses to probe stimuli on modulated backgrounds.

Authors:  Barry B Lee; Hao Sun; Dingcai Cao
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Frequency-doubling technology and parasol cells.

Authors:  Ted Maddess
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Predicting progression of glaucoma from rates of frequency doubling technology perimetry change.

Authors:  Daniel Meira-Freitas; Andrew J Tatham; Renato Lisboa; Tung-Mei Kuang; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb; Christopher A Girkin; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 12.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.