Literature DB >> 12405481

Sociodynamic relationships between children who stutter and their non-stuttering classmates.

Stephen Davis1, Peter Howell, Frances Cooke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous research has indicated that children who stutter are more likely to be bullied and to hold a lower social position than their peers who do not stutter. However, the majority of this research has used data from respondents who were in the educational system more than 20 years ago. The current policy on integration of children with severe disabilities into mainstream education and the increased awareness of bullying in schools would indicate that attitudes toward children who stutter might have changed in the intervening period.
METHOD: The study uses a sociometric scale (adapted from Coie, Dodge, & Coppotelli, 1982) to assess children who stutter in classroom groups with fluent peers. The peer relationships between 16 children who stutter and their classmates (403 children in total) were examined.
RESULTS: Children who stutter were rejected significantly more often than were their peers and were significantly less likely to be popular. When compared to children who do not stutter, the children who stutter were less likely to be nominated as 'leaders' and were more likely to be nominated to the 'bullied' and 'seeks help' categories.
CONCLUSIONS: The changes in integration policy and the implementation of anti-bullying policies in many schools appear to have made little impact on the social status of children who stutter. The incidence of bullying and rejection reported in this study has implications for schools and clinicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12405481      PMCID: PMC1999299          DOI: 10.1111/1469-7610.00093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry        ISSN: 0021-9630            Impact factor:   8.982


  13 in total

1.  Social relationships among speech defective children.

Authors:  F L BRISSEY; W D TROTTER
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1955-09

2.  Social position and speaking competence of stuttering and normally fluent boys.

Authors:  C L Woods
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1974-12

3.  Reactions of college students to speech disorders.

Authors:  S L McKinnon; C W Hess; R G Landry
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 2.288

Review 4.  Peer relations and later personal adjustment: are low-accepted children at risk?

Authors:  J G Parker; S R Asher
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Treatment efficacy: stuttering.

Authors:  E G Conture
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1996-10

6.  Sociometric status and social behaviour of children with and without learning difficulties.

Authors:  D Nabuzoka; P K Smith
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 8.982

7.  The social status of speech-handicapped children.

Authors:  D K Marge
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1966-06

8.  Self-reports of short- and long-term effects of bullying on children who stammer.

Authors:  S Hugh-Jones; P K Smith
Journal:  Br J Educ Psychol       Date:  1999-06

9.  Traits attributed to stuttering and normally fluent males.

Authors:  C L Woods; D E Williams
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1976-06

10.  Speech clinicians' conceptions of boys and men who stutter.

Authors:  C L Woods; D E Williams
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1971-05
View more
  16 in total

1.  The Role of Effortful Control in Stuttering Severity in Children: Replication Study.

Authors:  Shelly Jo Kraft; Emily Lowther; Janet Beilby
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 2.408

2.  Randomised controlled trial of the Lidcombe programme of early stuttering intervention.

Authors:  Mark Jones; Mark Onslow; Ann Packman; Shelley Williams; Tika Ormond; Ilsa Schwarz; Val Gebski
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-08-11

3.  Retrospective Experiences of Cyberbullying and Emotional Outcomes on Young Adults Who Stutter.

Authors:  Stephanie Nicolai; Robert Geffner; Ronald Stolberg; J Scott Yaruss
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Trauma       Date:  2018-03-23

4.  Understanding the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering Can Improve Stuttering Therapy.

Authors:  Seth E Tichenor; Caryn Herring; J Scott Yaruss
Journal:  Top Lang Disord       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar

Review 5.  Non-pharmacological interventions for stuttering in children six years and younger.

Authors:  Åse Sjøstrand; Elaina Kefalianos; Hilde Hofslundsengen; Linn S Guttormsen; Melanie Kirmess; Arne Lervåg; Charles Hulme; Kari-Anne Bottegaard Næss
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-09

6.  Latent Class Analysis Reveals Distinct Groups Based on Executive Function and Socioemotional Traits, Developmental Conditions, and Stuttering: A Population Study.

Authors:  Sara Ashley Smith; Ai Leen Choo; Matthew E Foster
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2021-03-30

Review 7.  Shedding light on a pervasive problem: a review of research on bullying experiences among children with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Jessica H Schroeder; M Catherine Cappadocia; James M Bebko; Debra J Pepler; Jonathan A Weiss
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2014-07

8.  Involvement of social factors in stuttering: A review and assessment of current methodology.

Authors:  Adrian Furnham; Stephen Davis
Journal:  Stammering Res       Date:  2004-07-01

9.  Impact of cognitive behavioural play therapy on social anxiety among school children with stuttering deficit: A cluster randomised trial with three months follow-up.

Authors:  Patience Enuma Obiweluozo; Moses Onyemaechi Ede; Chimezie Nneka Onwurah; Uchenna Eugenia Uzodinma; Ibiwari Caroline Dike; Juliana Ngozi Ejiofor
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  'Satan is holding your tongue back': Stuttering as moral failure.

Authors:  Dane H Isaacs
Journal:  Afr J Disabil       Date:  2021-04-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.