BACKGROUND: The serum markers CA125, tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPS), and soluble interleukin-2 receptor alpha (sIL-2Ralpha) concentrations were determined in sera, cyst, and ascitic fluids from patients with malignant and benign ovarian neoplasms. METHODS: CA125, TPS, and sIL-2Ralpha concentrations were measured in sera, cyst, and ascitic fluids by immunoassays in 67 patients with carcinoma and in 32 patients with benign ovarian neoplasms. RESULTS: CA125, TPS, and sIL-2Ralpha levels were elevated significantly in sera from patients who had ovarian carcinoma compared with patients who had benign neoplasms (P < 0.001). Patients who had International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Stage III-IV disease had significantly higher serum levels for the markers studied compared with patients who had FIGO Stage I-II disease (P < 0.001 for CA125; P = 0.02 for TPS and sIL-2Ralpha). Concurrent measurement of CA125 and sIL-2Ralpha in sera identified 100% of ovarian carcinomas in FIGO Stage I-II. All patients with carcinoma demonstrated markedly higher levels of CA125 and TPS for both cyst and ascites compared with corresponding sera (P < 0.001). The level of sIL-2Ralpha was higher statistically in ascitic fluid compared with the level in serum (P < 0.001); however, its values in sera and cyst fluids were comparable. In ascitic fluid, the CA125 level was significantly higher in patients who had FIGO Stage III-IV disease compared with patients who had FIGO Stage I-II disease (P = 0.002), whereas such correlations were not found for TPS or sIL-2Ralpha. In cyst fluids, the levels of all studied markers were independent of the FIGO stage. In cyst fluids from patients with benign ovarian neoplasms, TPS and sIL-2Ralpha levels were significantly lower compared with the levels in patients with ovarian carcinoma (P < 0.001), whereas the values of CA125 were overlapping. CA125 and TPS concentrations were higher in cyst fluids compared with corresponding sera, whereas sIL-2Ralpha levels were comparable and low in cyst fluids and in the circulation of patients with benign neoplasms. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ovarian carcinoma, TPS and CA125 concentrations were significantly higher in the place of their generation compared with the concentrations in blood circulation. sIL-2Ralpha values were higher in ascites compared with the values in corresponding sera, and its concentrations in sera and cyst fluids were comparable. The assessment of serum sIL-2Ralpha levels showed potential complementary value to CA125 for the detection of ovarian carcinoma in early FIGO stages; however, a 9% false positive rate limited the significance of cumulative value for a combination of these circulating markers. Copyright 2002 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: The serum markers CA125, tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPS), and soluble interleukin-2 receptor alpha (sIL-2Ralpha) concentrations were determined in sera, cyst, and ascitic fluids from patients with malignant and benign ovarian neoplasms. METHODS:CA125, TPS, and sIL-2Ralpha concentrations were measured in sera, cyst, and ascitic fluids by immunoassays in 67 patients with carcinoma and in 32 patients with benign ovarian neoplasms. RESULTS:CA125, TPS, and sIL-2Ralpha levels were elevated significantly in sera from patients who had ovarian carcinoma compared with patients who had benign neoplasms (P < 0.001). Patients who had International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Stage III-IV disease had significantly higher serum levels for the markers studied compared with patients who had FIGO Stage I-II disease (P < 0.001 for CA125; P = 0.02 for TPS and sIL-2Ralpha). Concurrent measurement of CA125 and sIL-2Ralpha in sera identified 100% of ovarian carcinomas in FIGO Stage I-II. All patients with carcinoma demonstrated markedly higher levels of CA125 and TPS for both cyst and ascites compared with corresponding sera (P < 0.001). The level of sIL-2Ralpha was higher statistically in ascitic fluid compared with the level in serum (P < 0.001); however, its values in sera and cyst fluids were comparable. In ascitic fluid, the CA125 level was significantly higher in patients who had FIGO Stage III-IV disease compared with patients who had FIGO Stage I-II disease (P = 0.002), whereas such correlations were not found for TPS or sIL-2Ralpha. In cyst fluids, the levels of all studied markers were independent of the FIGO stage. In cyst fluids from patients with benign ovarian neoplasms, TPS and sIL-2Ralpha levels were significantly lower compared with the levels in patients with ovarian carcinoma (P < 0.001), whereas the values of CA125 were overlapping. CA125 and TPS concentrations were higher in cyst fluids compared with corresponding sera, whereas sIL-2Ralpha levels were comparable and low in cyst fluids and in the circulation of patients with benign neoplasms. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ovarian carcinoma, TPS and CA125 concentrations were significantly higher in the place of their generation compared with the concentrations in blood circulation. sIL-2Ralpha values were higher in ascites compared with the values in corresponding sera, and its concentrations in sera and cyst fluids were comparable. The assessment of serum sIL-2Ralpha levels showed potential complementary value to CA125 for the detection of ovarian carcinoma in early FIGO stages; however, a 9% false positive rate limited the significance of cumulative value for a combination of these circulating markers. Copyright 2002 American Cancer Society.
Authors: Umran Kucukgoz Gulec; Semra Paydas; Ahmet Baris Guzel; Selim Buyukkurt; Gulsah Seydaoglu; Mehmet Ali Vardar Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2012-01-25 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Shalini Makawita; Chris Smith; Ihor Batruch; Yingye Zheng; Felix Rückert; Robert Grützmann; Christian Pilarsky; Steven Gallinger; Eleftherios P Diamandis Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2011-06-07 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Janet S Rader; James P Malone; Julia Gross; Petra Gilmore; Rebecca A Brooks; Loan Nguyen; Dan L Crimmins; Sheng Feng; Jason D Wright; Nicholas Taylor; Israel Zighelboim; Margo C Funk; Phyllis C Huettner; Jack H Ladenson; David Gius; R Reid Townsend Journal: Proteomics Clin Appl Date: 2008-10-22 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Simona Principe; Yunee Kim; Simona Fontana; Vladimir Ignatchenko; Julius O Nyalwidhe; Raymond S Lance; Dean A Troyer; Riccardo Alessandro; O John Semmes; Thomas Kislinger; Richard R Drake; Jeffrey A Medin Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2012-02-29 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Karen D Daniel; Grace Y Kim; Christophoros C Vassiliou; Marilyn Galindo; Alexander R Guimaraes; Ralph Weissleder; Al Charest; Robert Langer; Michael J Cima Journal: Biosens Bioelectron Date: 2009-04-16 Impact factor: 10.618
Authors: Steven J Skates; Michael A Gillette; Joshua LaBaer; Steven A Carr; Leigh Anderson; Daniel C Liebler; David Ransohoff; Nader Rifai; Marina Kondratovich; Živana Težak; Elizabeth Mansfield; Ann L Oberg; Ian Wright; Grady Barnes; Mitchell Gail; Mehdi Mesri; Christopher R Kinsinger; Henry Rodriguez; Emily S Boja Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2013-10-28 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Katherine R Kozak; Malaika W Amneus; Suzanne M Pusey; Feng Su; Mui N Luong; Sam A Luong; Srinivasa T Reddy; Robin Farias-Eisner Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-10-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: N Ahmed; G Barker; K T Oliva; P Hoffmann; C Riley; S Reeve; A I Smith; B E Kemp; M A Quinn; G E Rice Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2004-07-05 Impact factor: 7.640