BACKGROUND: Methotrexate is the most efficient anticancer drug in osteosarcoma. It requires individual exposure monitoring because of the high doses used, its wide interpatient pharmacokinetic variability and the existence of demonstrated relationships between efficacy, toxicity and serum drug concentrations. OBJECTIVE: To develop a maximum a posteriori (MAP) Bayesian estimator able to predict individual pharmacokinetic parameters and exposure indices such as area under the curve (AUC) for methotrexate from a few blood samples, in order to prevent toxicity and facilitate further studies of the relationships between efficacy and exposure. METHODS: Methotrexate population pharmacokinetics were estimated by a retrospective analysis of concentration data from 40 children and young adults by using the nonparametric expectation maximisation method NPEM. A linear two-compartment model with elimination from the central compartment was assumed. Individual pharmacokinetic parameters and AUC were subsequently estimated in 30 other young patients, using MAP Bayesian estimation as implemented in two programs, ADAPT II and an inhouse program Winphar((R)). RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic parameters used in the model were the volume of the central compartment (V(1)) and the transfer constants (k(10), k(12) and k(21)). The mean values (with percentage coefficient of variation) obtained were: 18.24L (54.1%) and 0.41 (42.3%), 0.0168 (68.7%), and 0.1069 (61.3%) h(-1), respectively. Bayesian forecasting enabled nonbiased estimation of AUC and systemic clearance using a schedule with two sampling times (6 and 24 hours after the beginning of the infusion) and either program. Collection of a third sample at 4 hours improved the precision. CONCLUSION: The Bayesian adaptive method developed herein allows accurate estimation of individual exposure to methotrexate and can easily be used in clinical practice.
BACKGROUND:Methotrexate is the most efficient anticancer drug in osteosarcoma. It requires individual exposure monitoring because of the high doses used, its wide interpatient pharmacokinetic variability and the existence of demonstrated relationships between efficacy, toxicity and serum drug concentrations. OBJECTIVE: To develop a maximum a posteriori (MAP) Bayesian estimator able to predict individual pharmacokinetic parameters and exposure indices such as area under the curve (AUC) for methotrexate from a few blood samples, in order to prevent toxicity and facilitate further studies of the relationships between efficacy and exposure. METHODS:Methotrexate population pharmacokinetics were estimated by a retrospective analysis of concentration data from 40 children and young adults by using the nonparametric expectation maximisation method NPEM. A linear two-compartment model with elimination from the central compartment was assumed. Individual pharmacokinetic parameters and AUC were subsequently estimated in 30 other young patients, using MAP Bayesian estimation as implemented in two programs, ADAPT II and an inhouse program Winphar((R)). RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic parameters used in the model were the volume of the central compartment (V(1)) and the transfer constants (k(10), k(12) and k(21)). The mean values (with percentage coefficient of variation) obtained were: 18.24L (54.1%) and 0.41 (42.3%), 0.0168 (68.7%), and 0.1069 (61.3%) h(-1), respectively. Bayesian forecasting enabled nonbiased estimation of AUC and systemic clearance using a schedule with two sampling times (6 and 24 hours after the beginning of the infusion) and either program. Collection of a third sample at 4 hours improved the precision. CONCLUSION: The Bayesian adaptive method developed herein allows accurate estimation of individual exposure to methotrexate and can easily be used in clinical practice.
Authors: G Bacci; S Ferrari; N Delepine; F Bertoni; P Picci; M Mercuri; P Bacchini; A Brach del Prever; A Tienghi; A Comandone; M Campanacci Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1998-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: E Masson; M V Relling; T W Synold; Q Liu; J D Schuetz; J T Sandlund; C H Pui; W E Evans Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 1996-01-01 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Dolores Aumente; Dolores Santos Buelga; John C Lukas; Pedro Gomez; Antonio Torres; Maria José García Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2006 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Ryan J Beechinor; Patrick A Thompson; Michael F Hwang; Ryan C Vargo; Lisa R Bomgaars; Jacqueline G Gerhart; ZoAnn E Dreyer; Daniel Gonzalez Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Usman Arshad; Max Taubert; Tamina Seeger-Nukpezah; Sami Ullah; Kirsten C Spindeldreier; Ulrich Jaehde; Michael Hallek; Uwe Fuhr; Jörg Janne Vehreschild; Carolin Jakob Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2021-06-20 Impact factor: 4.430