Literature DB >> 12403171

Karyotype evolution in Tilapia: mitotic and meiotic chromosome analysis of Oreochromis karongae and O. niloticus x O. karongae hybrids.

S C Harvey1, R Campos-Ramos, D D Kennedy, M T Ezaz, N R Bromage, D K Griffin, D J Penman.   

Abstract

The karyotype of Oreochromis species is considered to be highly conserved, with a diploid chromosome complement of 2n = 44. Here we show, by analysis of mitotic and meiotic chromosomes, that the karyotype of O. karongae, one of the Lake Malawi 'chambo' species, is 2n = 38. This difference in chromosome number does not prevent the production of inter-specific hybrids between O. niloticus (2n = 44) and O. karongae (2n = 38). Analysis of the meiotic chromosomes of the O. niloticus x O. karongae hybrids indicates that three separate chromosome fusion events have occurred in O. karongae. Comparison of the O. karongae and O. niloticus karyotypes suggests that these consist of one Robertsonian fusion and two fusions of a more complex nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12403171     DOI: 10.1023/a:1020190918431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  11 in total

1.  Transposable elements as a potential source for understanding the fish genome.

Authors:  Daniela Cristina Ferreira; Fabio Porto-Foresti; Claudio Oliveira; Fausto Foresti
Journal:  Mob Genet Elements       Date:  2011-07-01

2.  Characterisation of the chromosome fusions in Oreochromis karongae.

Authors:  Jose C Mota-Velasco; Irani Alves Ferreira; Marcelo B Cioffi; Konrad Ocalewicz; Rafael Campos-Ramos; Andrey Shirak; Bo-Young Lee; Cesar Martins; David J Penman
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  The dragon lizard Pogona vitticeps has ZZ/ZW micro-sex chromosomes.

Authors:  Tariq Ezaz; Alexander E Quinn; Ikuo Miura; Stephen D Sarre; Arthur Georges; Jennifer A Marshall Graves
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2005-12-08       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Is the Y chromosome disappearing?--both sides of the argument.

Authors:  Darren K Griffin
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  Chromosome differentiation patterns during cichlid fish evolution.

Authors:  Andréia B Poletto; Irani A Ferreira; Diogo C Cabral-de-Mello; Rafael T Nakajima; Juliana Mazzuchelli; Heraldo B Ribeiro; Paulo C Venere; Mauro Nirchio; Thomas D Kocher; Cesar Martins
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.797

6.  Comparative cytogenetics of cichlid fishes through genomic in-situ hybridization (GISH) with emphasis on Oreochromis niloticus.

Authors:  Guilherme Targino Valente; Carlos Henrique Schneider; Maria Claudia Gross; Eliana Feldberg; Cesar Martins
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  A syntenic region conserved from fish to Mammalian x chromosome.

Authors:  Guijun Guan; Meisheng Yi; Tohru Kobayashi; Yunhan Hong; Yoshitaka Nagahama
Journal:  Int J Evol Biol       Date:  2014-11-18

Review 8.  Unusual Diversity of Sex Chromosomes in African Cichlid Fishes.

Authors:  William J Gammerdinger; Thomas D Kocher
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 4.096

9.  Integrating cytogenetics and genomics in comparative evolutionary studies of cichlid fish.

Authors:  Juliana Mazzuchelli; Thomas David Kocher; Fengtang Yang; Cesar Martins
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-09-09       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  A microsatellite-based linkage map of salt tolerant tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus x Oreochromis spp.) and mapping of sex-determining loci.

Authors:  Feng Liu; Fei Sun; Jian Li; Jun Hong Xia; Grace Lin; Rong Jian Tu; Gen Hua Yue
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.