Literature DB >> 12402009

Comparison of methods for determining cricopharyngeal intrabolus pressure in normal patients as possible indicator for cricopharyngeal myotomy.

Tanja Bammer1, John R Salassa, Paul J Klingler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare methods for determining intrabolus cricopharyngeal pressure as a possible indicator for cricopharyngeal myotomy. STUDY
DESIGN: We determined multiple intrabolus pressures in the cricopharyngeal region of 20 normal volunteers, of whom 12 were 20 to 35 years old and 8 were older than 75 years. Data were collected using a commercially available manofluorography system and a 6-sensor unidirectional solid-state 2- x 4-mm catheter. Each subject underwent 5 5-mL and 5 10-mL liquid barium swallows. Data were analyzed, and young subjects were compared with old subjects.
RESULTS: The mean mid-bolus pressures in young subjects were 5.2 +/- 4.9 mm Hg and 7.2 +/- 6.5 mm Hg for the 5-mL and 10-mL swallows, respectively, and in older subjects, 10.8 +/- 8.8 mm Hg and 12.3 +/- 7.4 mm Hg. The mean gradient pressures across the 3-cm cricopharyngeal region in young subjects were 2.02 +/- 5.0 mm Hg, and -0.91 +/- 4.8 mm Hg for the 5-mL and 10-mL swallows, respectively, and for older subjects, 4.38 +/- 3.1 mm Hg and 2.82 +/- 3.4 mm Hg.
CONCLUSIONS: Cricopharyngeal intrabolus pressures were lower in young than in older subjects. The mid-bolus pressure and the gradient pressure across the cricopharyngeal region appeared to be the most consistent methods for evaluating intrabolus pressures. SIGNIFICANCE: Intrabolus pressure anomalies in the cricopharyngeal region have been proposed as an indicator for selecting patients who would benefit from cricopharyngeal myotomy. The methods of determining intrabolus pressures vary, with resulting variations in recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12402009     DOI: 10.1067/mhn.2002.128554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  5 in total

Review 1.  Manofluorography in the evaluation of oropharyngeal dysphagia.

Authors:  Noga Nativ-Zeltzer; Peter J Kahrilas; Jerilyn A Logemann
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 2.  Therapeutic intervention in oropharyngeal dysphagia.

Authors:  Rosemary Martino; Timothy McCulloch
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 46.802

3.  Methods for measuring swallowing pressure variability using high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  Corinne A Jones; Ellen L Meisner; Courtney K Broadfoot; Sarah P Rosen; Christine R Samuelsen; Timothy M McCulloch
Journal:  Front Appl Math Stat       Date:  2018-07-02

4.  Pressure topography metrics for high-resolution pharyngeal-esophageal manofluorography-a normative study of younger and older adults.

Authors:  N Nativ-Zeltzer; J A Logemann; S G Zecker; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  Combined Anterior Osteophytectomy and Cricopharyngeal Myotomy for Treatment of DISH-Associated Dysphagia.

Authors:  Kevin Hines; Nicholas Elmer; Maxwell Detweiler; Umma Fatema; Glenn A Gonzalez; Thiago S Montenegro; Daniel Franco; Srinivas Prasad; Jack Jallo; Ashwini Sharan; Joshua Heller; Maurits Boon; Joseph Spiegel; James Harrop
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-11-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.