Literature DB >> 12401049

Cephalometric determinants of successful functional appliance therapy.

H P Patel1, H C Moseley, J H Noar.   

Abstract

This retrospective study was undertaken to determine the presence of any features on a pretreatment lateral cephalogram that may be used to predict the success of improvement in the sagittal dental base relationship during functional appliance therapy in patients with a Class II skeletal pattern. Seventy-two patients judged to have been successfully treated with a functional appliance were selected for the study. Pre- and posttreatment radiographs were analyzed and the change in the ANB angle was used to determine the skeletal response to treatment. Within the total sample size of 72 patients, two groups were selected. One group of 13 patients who demonstrated a reduction in ANB angle of 3.0 degrees or more were identified as the skeletal group. A second group of 15 patients who demonstrated a change in ANB angle equal to or less than 0.5 degrees were identified as the nonskeletal group. Statistical analysis of these two groups revealed the presence of skeletal and dentoalveolar differences on the pretreatment lateral cephalogram. In the skeletal group, which responded with a favorable skeletal change, the mandible was smaller both in length (P < .01) and ramus height (P < .05) and the anterior and posterior lower face heights were smaller (P < .05). The cranial base was also smaller when compared with the respective lengths in the nonskeletal group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12401049     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2002)072<0410:CDOSFA>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  8 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of treatment effects between two fixed functional appliances for correction of Class II malocclusion: A single-center, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Vinni Arora; Rekha Sharma; Sonal Chowdhary
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Orthodontists' preference on type of rigid fixed functional appliance for skeletal Class II correction: A survey study.

Authors:  Sarah Borghei; James Broadbent; Richard Stevens; Kishore Chaudhry; Karthikeyan Subramani
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-10-01

3.  Treatment and posttreatment effects induced by the Forsus appliance: A controlled clinical study.

Authors:  Giorgio Cacciatore; Luis Tomas Huanca Ghislanzoni; Lisa Alvetro; Veronica Giuntini; Lorenzo Franchi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  PowerScope a Class II corrector - A case report.

Authors:  Joby Paulose; Palathottungal Joseph Antony; Brijesh Sureshkumar; Susha Mariam George; Manu Mundackal Mathew; Joseph Sebastian
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

5.  Predictors of favorable soft tissue profile outcomes following Class II Twin-block treatment.

Authors:  Ji-Eun Kim; Su-Jung Mah; Tae-Woo Kim; Su-Jung Kim; Ki-Ho Park; Yoon-Goo Kang
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2017-11-19       Impact factor: 1.372

6.  Masseter muscle thickness and vertical cephalometric characteristics in children with Class II malocclusion.

Authors:  Eirini Tentolouri; Gregory S Antonarakis; Ioanna Georgiakaki; Stavros Kiliaridis
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2022-02-11

7.  Long-term dentoskeletal changes with the Bionator, Herbst, Twin Block, and MARA functional appliances.

Authors:  Nicole J Siara-Olds; Valmy Pangrazio-Kulbersh; Jeff Berger; Burcu Bayirli
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Effects of bite-jumping appliances on mandibular advancement in growing rats: A radiographic study.

Authors:  Ridvan Oksayan; Oral Sokucu; Neslihan Ucuncu
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2014-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.