Literature DB >> 12399850

Comparison between three-dimensional presentation of endoscopic procedures with polarization glasses and an autostereoscopic display.

U D A Mueller-Richter1, A Limberger, P Weber, W Spitzer, M Schilling.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most endoscopic procedures are done with a two-dimensional (2D) view or a spatial presentation with polarization glasses. A new method of presenting three-dimensional (3D) spatial views is the autostereocopic display. We compared the performances of untrained test persons using these methods.
METHODS: We designed three tests that had to be performed with one of the presentations. We used a Karl Storz 3D set with a 0 degrees stereooptic and a grasper. The autostereoscopic display was the Dresden 3D display. The 59 test persons were students who had never before worked with endoscopic devices.
RESULTS: There were few differences between the tests, and none were statistically significant. The results with 2D were slightly better than those with polarization glasses, and the results with polarization glasses were slightly better than those with the autostereoscopic display.
CONCLUSIONS: There are few differences between the procedures. A true spatial view is limited by the similarity of the two half-pictures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12399850     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-9094-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  4 in total

1.  [Comparative study of spatial imaging techniques in stereo-endoscopy].

Authors:  U D A Müller-Richter; A Limberger; P Weber; M Schilling
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2003-05-01

Review 2.  Possibilities and limitations of current stereo-endoscopy.

Authors:  U D A Mueller-Richter; A Limberger; P Weber; K W Ruprecht; W Spitzer; M Schilling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Comparative evaluation of HD 2D/3D laparoscopic monitors and benchmarking to a theoretically ideal 3D pseudodisplay: even well-experienced laparoscopists perform better with 3D.

Authors:  D Wilhelm; S Reiser; N Kohn; M Witte; U Leiner; L Mühlbach; D Ruschin; W Reiner; H Feussner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Evolution of stereoscopic imaging in surgery and recent advances.

Authors:  Katie Schwab; Ralph Smith; Vanessa Brown; Martin Whyte; Iain Jourdan
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-08-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.