Literature DB >> 12395942

Proprioception in poor- and well-functioning anterior cruciate ligament deficient patients.

T O Jensen1, T Fischer-Rasmussen, M Kjaer, S P Magnusson.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine proprioception with and without muscle tension and knee function in two groups of chronic (> 1 year post-injury) patients with deficient anterior cruciate ligaments with distinctly different functioning levels. The well (WF) and poor functioning (PF) group was defined as those with a Tegner/Lysholm score equal to or greater than 6/95 (WF, n = 7), and equal to or less than 4/83 (PF, n = 7), respectively. Clinical examination included a Lachman, and a Pivot shift test, as well as a KT2000 arthrometer assessment. Single and triple hop tests assessed one-legged performance. Proprioception was measured as threshold of passive movement detection, and as the ability to reproduce flexion angles with (20% and 50% MVC) and without muscle tension. Mean Tegner/Lysholm scores were: WF: 7 (range 6-8)/98 (range 95-100), PF: 2 (range 1-4)/71 (range 62-80). There were significant differences between the Pivot shift tests of the groups (p = 0.01). The laxity (KT2000) assessment yielded a significant (3 mm, p < 0.05) side-to-side difference in both groups. One-leg hop tests yielded no side-to-side differences in any of the groups or between the groups. There were no significant differences between the groups in any of the proprioceptive tests, except in one of the angle reproduction tests with muscle tension (20%, p < 0.05). WF had larger mean errors than PF. There was not found any side-to-side difference in any of the proprioceptive tests, except in one of the angle reproduction tests with muscle tension (WF, 20%, p < 0.05). In conclusion, these data suggest that subjects with long standing anterior cruciate ligament deficiency in the present study did not have a knee joint proprioceptive deficit as measured by some commonly accepted methods. There was no difference in proprioception between the two groups despite their markedly different function levels and pivot shift evaluated knee laxity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12395942     DOI: 10.1080/165019702753714174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Med        ISSN: 1650-1977            Impact factor:   2.912


  12 in total

1.  Proprioceptive skills and functional outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a bone-tendon-bone graft.

Authors:  J O Anders; R A Venbrocks; M Weinberg
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  THE EFFECT OF CONSERVATIVELY TREATED ACL INJURY ON KNEE JOINT POSITION Sense.

Authors:  Nicola Relph; Lee Herrington
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-08

3.  Visual and proprioceptive feedback improves knee joint position sense.

Authors:  Timothy J Brindle; J C Mizelle; Maria K Lebiedowska; Jeri L Miller; Steven J Stanhope
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and return to sport activity: postural control as the key to success.

Authors:  Rocco Papalia; Francesco Franceschi; Andrea Tecame; Stefano D'Adamio; Nicola Maffulli; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  The effect of physiotherapy on knee joint extensor and flexor muscle strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon.

Authors:  Andrzej Czamara; Wieslaw Tomaszewski; Tadeusz Bober; Bartosz Lubarski
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2011-01

6.  Dynamic assessment in patients following bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Roger Lyon; Xue-Cheng Liu; John Hung; Thomas W Kernozek
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2011-04-28

7.  Effect of Time after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears on Proprioception and Postural Stability.

Authors:  Dae-Hee Lee; Jin-Hyuck Lee; Sung-Eun Ahn; Min-Ji Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Auditory Proprioceptive Integration: Effects of Real-Time Kinematic Auditory Feedback on Knee Proprioception.

Authors:  Shashank Ghai; Gerd Schmitz; Tong-Hun Hwang; Alfred O Effenberg
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Alterations in sensorimotor function after ACL reconstruction during active joint position sense testing. A systematic review.

Authors:  Aglaja Busch; Angela Blasimann; Frank Mayer; Heiner Baur
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Properties of Knee Joint Position Sense Tests for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrew Strong; Ashokan Arumugam; Eva Tengman; Ulrik Röijezon; Charlotte K Häger
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-07-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.