Literature DB >> 25192689

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and return to sport activity: postural control as the key to success.

Rocco Papalia1, Francesco Franceschi, Andrea Tecame, Stefano D'Adamio, Nicola Maffulli, Vincenzo Denaro.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The risk for re-tear following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is influenced by several hormonal, neuromuscular, biomechanical and anatomic factors. One of the most important negative prognostic factors that markedly increase the risk for ACL re-tear is the presence of high knee-abduction moment (KAM), which can be measured immediately by landing on both feet after a vertical jump. We evaluated the effect in postoperative values for KAM according to the type of graft used for ACL reconstruction (hamstring vs patellar tendon) and a specific rehabilitation protocol focusing on recovery of muscular strength, proprioception and joint stabilisation.
METHODS: From November 2010 to September 2012, we enrolled 40 female recreational athletes with clinical and imaging evidence of ACL tear and randomised them in two groups. One group of patients underwent reconstruction with a hamstring-tendon graft and the second with a patellar-tendon graft. A custom rehabilitation programme focusing on proprioception was adopted. Clinical outcomes [International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scores] and performance in functional test for stability (single-leg hop, timed hop, crossover triple hop, KAM test) were assessed preoperatively at three and six months postoperatively.
RESULTS: All patients showed statistically significant clinical improvements postoperatively when compared with preoperative values (P < 0.0001). No significant intergroup difference was observed in all clinical scores and functional tests, with the exception of the value registered for the KAM test (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: ACL reconstruction using patellar-tendon graft followed by rehabilitation centred on strength, proprioception and stability restoration can produce satisfactory values for KAM within the physiological range. The surgical strategies should be adapted to the patient on the basis of a multidisciplinary approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25192689     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2513-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  61 in total

1.  A five-year comparison of patellar tendon versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Leo A Pinczewski; David J Deehan; Lucy J Salmon; Vivianne J Russell; Amanda Clingeleffer
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Static and dynamic postural control in competitive athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and controls.

Authors:  Farshid Mohammadi; Mahyar Salavati; Behnam Akhbari; Masood Mazaheri; Mojdeh Khorrami; Hossein Negahban
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female athletes: Part 1, mechanisms and risk factors.

Authors:  Timothy E Hewett; Gregory D Myer; Kevin R Ford
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  ACL stability, function, and arthritis: what have we been missing?

Authors:  Nicola Maffulli; Leonardo Osti
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.390

5.  Incidence and risk factors for graft rupture and contralateral rupture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Lucy Salmon; Vivianne Russell; Tim Musgrove; Leo Pinczewski; Kathryn Refshauge
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Reconstructive versus non-reconstructive treatment of anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. A retrospective matched-pair long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Nikolaus A Streich; David Zimmermann; Gerrit Bode; Holger Schmitt
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Osteoarthrosis following insufficiency of the cruciate ligaments in man. A clinical study.

Authors:  K Jacobsen
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1977

8.  Static and dynamic correlates of the knee adduction moment in healthy knees ranging from normal to varus-aligned.

Authors:  Joaquin A Barrios; Jill S Higginson; Todd D Royer; Irene S Davis
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 9.  Surgical management of partial tears of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Rocco Papalia; Francesco Franceschi; Biagio Zampogna; Andrea Tecame; Nicola Maffulli; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Biomechanics and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Savio L-Y Woo; Changfu Wu; Ozgur Dede; Fabio Vercillo; Sabrina Noorani
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 2.359

View more
  10 in total

1.  Features of human autologous hamstring graft elongation after pre-tensioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Masataka Fujii; Takayuki Furumatsu; Shinichi Miyazawa; Takaaki Tanaka; Hiroto Inoue; Yuya Kodama; Kenji Masuda; Noritaka Seno; Toshifumi Ozaki
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Test Batteries After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Chelsey Roe; Cale Jacobs; Johanna Hoch; Darren L Johnson; Brian Noehren
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 3.843

3.  Wearable inertial sensors and pressure MAT detect risk factors associated with ACL graft failure that are not possible with traditional return to sport assessments.

Authors:  Michael J Dan; Kimberly Kai Lun; Luke Dan; Jimmy Efird; Matthew Pelletier; David Broe; William R Walsh
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2019-07-02

4.  Quantifying Coordination and Variability in the Lower Extremities after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Sangheon Park; Sukhoon Yoon
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Is a tourniquet necessary in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?: A randomized controlled study protocol.

Authors:  Weifeng Liao; Xinning He; Zhiyong Du; Yi Long
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Changes in Dynamic Postural Stability After ACL Reconstruction: Results Over 2 Years of Follow-up.

Authors:  Robert H Brophy; Kevin A Schafer; Derrick M Knapik; John Motley; Amanda Haas; Matthew J Matava; Rick W Wright; Matthew V Smith
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-06-13

7.  Relationship Between Posterior Tibial Slope and Lower Extremity Biomechanics During a Single-Leg Drop Landing Combined With a Cognitive Task in Athletes After ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Naoya Kikuchi; Akihiro Kanamori; Hideki Kadone; Masaya Kajiwara; Kosuke Okuno; Kojiro Hyodo; Masashi Yamazaki
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-07-07

Review 8.  Neuroplasticity and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.

Authors:  George Kakavas; Nikolaos Malliaropoulos; Ricard Pruna; David Traster; Georgios Bikos; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 1.251

9.  Functional results from reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using the central third of the patellar ligament and flexor tendons.

Authors:  Marcos George de Souza Leao; Abelardo Gautama Moreira Pampolha; Nilton Orlando Junior
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-10-17

10.  Effects of Unilateral Electroacupuncture on Bilateral Proprioception in a Unilateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Model.

Authors:  Jie Xu; Xin Zhou; Xiaoguang Guo; Guoyou Wang; Shijie Fu; Lei Zhang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-08-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.