Literature DB >> 12395550

Interactive voice response: review of studies 1989-2000.

Ross Corkrey1, Lynne Parkinson.   

Abstract

A systematic review of the use of interactive voice response (IVR) was conducted. IVR is a telephone interviewing technique in which the human speaker is replaced by a high-quality recorded interactive script to which the respondent provides answers by pressing the keys of a touch telephone (touchphone). IVR has numerous advantages, including economy, autonomy, confidentiality, access to certain population groups, improved data quality, standardized interviewing, multilingual interfaces, and detailed longitudinal assessments. Despite this, there have been few applications of IVR. Previous studies have been in the areas of information services, reminder calls, monitoring, assessment, experimentation, interventions, and surveys. Areas that have received little attention have been the systematic evaluation of voice, multilingual interfaces, touchphone prevalence, survey response rates, use by the elderly, and acceptability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12395550     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput        ISSN: 0743-3808


  55 in total

1.  Challenges in using mobile phones for collection of antiretroviral therapy adherence data in a resource-limited setting.

Authors:  Jessica E Haberer; Julius Kiwanuka; Denis Nansera; Ira B Wilson; David R Bangsberg
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2010-12

2.  Design and development of a Telephone-Linked Care (TLC) system to reduce impulsivity among violent forensic outpatients and probationers.

Authors:  Anne H Berman; Ramesh Farzanfar; Marianne Kristiansson; Per Carlbring; Robert H Friedman
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  One holy grail: evidence- and measurement-based practice.

Authors:  John Greist
Journal:  Psychiatry (Edgmont)       Date:  2006-12

4.  Interactive Voice Response-An Innovative Approach to Post-Stroke Depression Self-Management Support.

Authors:  Lesli E Skolarus; John D Piette; Paul N Pfeiffer; Linda S Williams; Jason Mackey; Rebecca Hughes; Lewis B Morgenstern
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 6.829

5.  Using prize-based incentives to enhance daily interactive voice response (IVR) compliance: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Jan A Lindsay; Charles G Minard; Sonora Hudson; Charles E Green; Joy M Schmitz
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2013-09-09

6.  Interactive voice response version of the late-life function and disability instrument.

Authors:  Feng-Hang Chang; Nancy K Latham; Robert H Friedman; Alan M Jette
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Bias in child maltreatment self-reports using interactive voice response (IVR).

Authors:  Nancy J Kepple; Bridget Freisthler; Michelle Johnson-Motoyama
Journal:  Child Abuse Negl       Date:  2014-05-10

8.  Behavioral treatment for marijuana dependence: randomized trial of contingency management and self-efficacy enhancement.

Authors:  Mark D Litt; Ronald M Kadden; Nancy M Petry
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.913

9.  Engagement with automated patient monitoring and self-management support calls: experience with a thousand chronically ill patients.

Authors:  John D Piette; Ann-Marie Rosland; Nicolle S Marinec; Dana Striplin; Steven J Bernstein; Maria J Silveira
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Marijuana use and intoxication among daily users: an intensive longitudinal study.

Authors:  John R Hughes; James R Fingar; Alan J Budney; Shelly Naud; John E Helzer; Peter W Callas
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.913

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.