Literature DB >> 12394770

Multilayered small intestinal submucosa is inferior to autologous bowel for laparoscopic bladder augmentation.

Ryan F Paterson1, David A Lifshitz, Stephen D W Beck, Tibério M Siqueira, Liang Cheng, James E Lingeman, Arieh L Shalhav.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Bladder augmentation is most commonly performed with ileum. However, porcine small intestinal submucosa has been reported as a substitute for bowel for incorporation into the urinary tract. We assessed the feasibility and long-term 12-month results of laparoscopic bladder augmentation with ileum or multilayered small intestinal submucosa (Cook Biotech, Spencer, Indiana) in a porcine model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed laparoscopically assisted hemicystectomy and bladder augmentation in 24 female Yucatan mini-pigs using an ileal segment (12) or multilayered small intestinal submucosa (12). The followup protocol included anesthetic bladder capacity, renal ultrasonography and serum chemistry. At 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively, 4 animals per group were scheduled for sacrifice and pathological analysis.
RESULTS: Despite longer anastomotic time in the multilayered small intestinal submucosa group (120 versus 91 minutes, p = 0.026) total operative time was similar in the 2 groups. In each group bladder capacity increased with time but by 12 months bladder capacity was significantly better in the bowel than in the small intestinal submucosa group (825 versus 431 cc, p = 0.016). At 3 months pathological evaluation revealed that the multilayered regenerated bladder patch had shrunken and by 6 months it was replaced by dense calcified scar tissue. Long-term 6 and 12-month bladder capacity in the small intestinal submucosa group was the result of the regeneration of native bladder with exclusion of the whole multilayered patch in the majority of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic bladder augmentation using multilayered small intestinal submucosa produced functional and pathological results inferior to those of bowel at 12-month followup in a porcine model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12394770     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000024629.58795.43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  8 in total

1.  The incorporation of poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid nanoparticles into porcine small intestinal submucosa biomaterials.

Authors:  Fadee G Mondalek; Benjamin J Lawrence; Bradley P Kropp; Brian P Grady; Kar-Ming Fung; Sundar V Madihally; Hsueh-Kung Lin
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Urinary bladder auto augmentation using INTEGRA and SURGISIS: an experimental model.

Authors:  Gera Parshotam Kumar; Andrew Barker; Saeed Ahmed; Jevon Gerath; Jillian Orford
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 3.  Bladder biomechanics and the use of scaffolds for regenerative medicine in the urinary bladder.

Authors:  Fatemeh Ajalloueian; Greg Lemon; Jöns Hilborn; Ioannis S Chronakis; Magdalena Fossum
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  In vivo bladder regeneration using small intestinal submucosa: experimental study.

Authors:  P Caione; N Capozza; D Zavaglia; G Palombaro; R Boldrini
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2006-06-14       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 5.  Tissue engineering for the oncologic urinary bladder.

Authors:  Tomasz Drewa; Jan Adamowicz; Arun Sharma
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 6.  Understanding roles of porcine small intestinal submucosa in urinary bladder regeneration: identification of variable regenerative characteristics of small intestinal submucosa.

Authors:  Hsueh-Kung Lin; Shirley Yezdi Godiwalla; Blake Palmer; Dominic Frimberger; Qing Yang; Sundar V Madihally; Kar-Ming Fung; Bradley P Kropp
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 6.389

7.  Is the poly (L- lactide- co- caprolactone) nanofibrous membrane suitable for urinary bladder regeneration?

Authors:  Marta Pokrywczynska; Arkadiusz Jundzill; Jan Adamowicz; Tomasz Kowalczyk; Karolina Warda; Marta Rasmus; Lukasz Buchholz; Sandra Krzyzanowska; Pawel Nakielski; Tomasz Chmielewski; Magdalena Bodnar; Andrzej Marszalek; Robert Debski; Malgorzata Frontczak-Baniewicz; Grzegorz Mikułowski; Maciej Nowacki; Tomasz A Kowalewski; Tomasz Drewa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Renal capsule for augmentation cystoplasty in canine model: a favorable biomaterial?

Authors:  Mehdi Salehipour; Reza Mohammadian; Amir Malekahmadi; Massood Hosseinzadeh; Mahnaz Yadollahi; Mohammad Natami; Mahsa Mohammadian
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.