Literature DB >> 12394699

Minimally invasive ureteral stent retrieval.

William N Taylor1, Ian T McDougall.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We developed a minimally invasive (noncystoscopic) method for retrieving ureteral stents.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 30 consecutive patients underwent placement of a ureteral stent with a stainless steel bead attached to its distal end. The stent was later removed by a urethral catheter with a rare earth magnet attached to its proximal end.
RESULTS: In 29 of the 30 patients the stent with the attached bead was removed without difficulty or patient discomfort. The single failure occurred in a patient with a large median prostate lobe.
CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive, nonendoscopic ureteral stent retrieval was achieved in 97% of patients. The attractive force of the magnet for the bead was sufficient to attract and extract the stent. No adverse effects of the procedure or the stainless steel bead were noted. This magnet retrieval system is a feasible, simpler and less invasive alternative to cystoscopic retrieval of ureteral stents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12394699     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000033964.15384.e2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  13 in total

1.  Ureteral stents: new ideas, new designs.

Authors:  Abdulrahman Al-Aown; Iason Kyriazis; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Pantelis Kraniotis; Christos Rigopoulos; Dimitrios Karnabatidis; Theodore Petsas; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2010-04

2.  Can magnitip double-J stent serve as a substitute for a standard double-J stent?

Authors:  Ahmed Farouk; Ahmed Tawfick; Mohamed Hasan; Abdulwahab A Abuftira; Wael A Maged
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-11-01

3.  Evaluation of pain perception associated with use of the magnetic-end ureteric double-J stent for short-term ureteric stenting.

Authors:  S Sevcenco; K Eredics; L Lusuardi; Hans Christoph Klingler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Feasibility and safety of magnetic-end double-J ureteral stent insertion and removal in children.

Authors:  Marc Chalhoub; Jules Kohaut; Nicolas Vinit; Nathalie Botto; Yves Aigrain; Yves Héloury; Henri Lottmann; Thomas Blanc
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Revisiting the tethered ureteral stents in children: a novel modification.

Authors:  Abdol-Mohammad Kajbafzadeh; Behnam Nabavizadeh; Sorena Keihani; Seyed Hossein Hosseini Sharifi
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  JJ Stent Removal under Ultrasound Guidance in Women: It is Simple and Safe.

Authors:  Bernard Amer; Sandeep Gupta; Vijayendra S Kanwar; Bijit Lodh; Somarendra Khumukcham; Kaku Singh Akoijam
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-12-05

7.  Comparison of a magnetic retrieval device vs. flexible cystoscopy for removal of ureteral stents in renal transplant patients: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anil Kapoor; Jason Akerman; Emily C L Wong; Gaurav Vasisth; Fadil Hassan; Camilla Tajzler; Kevin Piercey; Jen Hoogenes; Shahid Lambe
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  "Bilateral Double J Stent Removal: The way to do it!".

Authors:  Rahul Yadav; Divakar Dalela; Neeraj K Goyal; Deepak Nagathan; Satya N Sankhwar
Journal:  J Surg Tech Case Rep       Date:  2012-07

9.  Ureteral stent retrieval using the crochet hook technique in females.

Authors:  Takashi Kawahara; Hiroki Ito; Hideyuki Terao; Takuya Yamagishi; Takehiko Ogawa; Hiroji Uemura; Yoshinobu Kubota; Junichi Matsuzaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A prospective and randomized comparison of rigid ureteroscopic to flexible cystoscopic retrieval of ureteral stents.

Authors:  Dehui Lai; Meiling Chen; Shifang Zha; Shawpong Wan
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 2.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.