OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to examine the relation of computer-measured ST depression (STdep) in the lateral precordial leads to the presence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). BACKGROUND: Qualitative abnormalities of repolarization in the lateral precordial leads of the electrocardiogram, as manifested by the strain pattern of T-wave inversion and STdep, are markers for LVH and adverse prognosis. However, the independent relationship of increased left ventricular (LV) mass to quantitative measures of STdep in these leads remains unclear. METHODS: Electrocardiograms and echocardiograms were examined in the second Strong Heart Study examination in 1,595 American Indian participants without evident coronary disease. The absolute magnitude of ST segment deviation above or below isoelectric baseline was measured by computer in leads V(5) and V(6), and participants were grouped according to gender-specific quartiles of maximal STdep. Left ventricular hypertrophy was defined by indexed LV mass >49.2 g/m(2.7) in men and >46.7 g/m(2.7) in women. RESULTS: Increasing STdep was associated with older age, greater pulse pressure, serum fibrinogen levels and urinary albumin/creatinine ratios, and with stepwise increases in LV mass (145 +/- 28 vs. 150 +/- 33 vs. 156 +/- 36 vs. 164 +/- 43 g, p < 0.001), indexed LV mass (38.2 +/- 7.7 vs. 39.3 +/- 8.7 vs. 40.5 +/- 9.4 vs. 44.0 +/- 11.0 g/m(2.7), p < 0.001), and prevalence of LVH (11.6 vs. 19.1 vs. 21.5 vs. 31.2%, p < 0.001). After controlling for clinical differences, increasing STdep remained strongly associated with increased prevalence of LVH (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of evidence of coronary disease, increasing STdep in the lateral precordial leads is associated with increasing LV mass and increased prevalence of anatomic LVH.
OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to examine the relation of computer-measured ST depression (STdep) in the lateral precordial leads to the presence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). BACKGROUND: Qualitative abnormalities of repolarization in the lateral precordial leads of the electrocardiogram, as manifested by the strain pattern of T-wave inversion and STdep, are markers for LVH and adverse prognosis. However, the independent relationship of increased left ventricular (LV) mass to quantitative measures of STdep in these leads remains unclear. METHODS: Electrocardiograms and echocardiograms were examined in the second Strong Heart Study examination in 1,595 American Indian participants without evident coronary disease. The absolute magnitude of ST segment deviation above or below isoelectric baseline was measured by computer in leads V(5) and V(6), and participants were grouped according to gender-specific quartiles of maximal STdep. Left ventricular hypertrophy was defined by indexed LV mass >49.2 g/m(2.7) in men and >46.7 g/m(2.7) in women. RESULTS: Increasing STdep was associated with older age, greater pulse pressure, serum fibrinogen levels and urinary albumin/creatinine ratios, and with stepwise increases in LV mass (145 +/- 28 vs. 150 +/- 33 vs. 156 +/- 36 vs. 164 +/- 43 g, p < 0.001), indexed LV mass (38.2 +/- 7.7 vs. 39.3 +/- 8.7 vs. 40.5 +/- 9.4 vs. 44.0 +/- 11.0 g/m(2.7), p < 0.001), and prevalence of LVH (11.6 vs. 19.1 vs. 21.5 vs. 31.2%, p < 0.001). After controlling for clinical differences, increasing STdep remained strongly associated with increased prevalence of LVH (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of evidence of coronary disease, increasing STdep in the lateral precordial leads is associated with increasing LV mass and increased prevalence of anatomic LVH.
Authors: Phillip E Melton; Sue Rutherford; Venkata Saroja Voruganti; Harald H H Göring; Sandra Laston; Karin Haack; Anthony G Comuzzie; Thomas D Dyer; Matthew P Johnson; Jack W Kent; Joanne E Curran; Eric K Moses; John Blangero; Ana Barac; Elisa T Lee; Lyle G Best; Richard R Fabsitz; Richard B Devereux; Peter M Okin; Jonathan N Bella; Uli Broeckel; Barbara V Howard; Jean W MacCluer; Shelley A Cole; Laura Almasy Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2010-07-03 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Peter M Okin; Mary J Roman; Elisa T Lee; James M Galloway; Lyle G Best; Barbara V Howard; Richard B Devereux Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2007-05-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Yuko Y Inoue; Elsayed Z Soliman; Kihei Yoneyama; Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh; Colin O Wu; Rodney Sparapani; David A Bluemke; João A C Lima; Hiroshi Ashikaga Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2017-09-20 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Stefan Buchner; Kurt Debl; Josef Haimerl; Behrus Djavidani; Florian Poschenrieder; Stefan Feuerbach; Guenter A J Riegger; Andreas Luchner Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2009-06-01 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: O S Ogah; O O Oladapo; A A Adebiyi; A K Adebayo; A Aje; D B Ojji; B L Salako; A O Falase Journal: Cardiovasc J Afr Date: 2008 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.167