Literature DB >> 12391964

Health technology assessment for medical devices in Europe. What must be considered.

Markus Siebert, Louis Christian Clauss, Malcolm Carlisle, Brigitte Casteels, Peter de Jong, Michael Kreuzer, Sukh Sanghera, Graham Stokoe, Paul Trueman, Antoinette Wenk Lang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To inform about the specifics of medical devices and the resulting consequences for health technology assessment (HTA) and to present the European industry position on this topic.
METHODS: The paper is based on an intensive debate within Eucomed, the European trade association in the field of medical devices, informed by an HTA Experts Group, comprising experts from within and outside the medical device industry.
RESULTS: Based on the specifics of medical devices, there are a number of methodologic considerations that require a tailored HTA, differing from the approach taken for, for example, pharmaceutical products. These differences have an impact on the selection of the technology, the timing of the assessment, the study design, and the patient population.
CONCLUSION: The European medical device industry can commit to an HTA that takes into consideration the specifics of medical technologies, which is appropriate and fair, and which is done under full participation of industry. Under these circumstances HTA can be a useful tool to support rational decision making in health care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12391964

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  5 in total

1.  Health technology assessment in critical care.

Authors:  Damon C Scales; Andreas Laupacis
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-10-20       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Lean systems approaches to health technology assessment: a patient-focused alternative to cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  John F P Bridges
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Health related quality of life of Canary Island citizens.

Authors:  Juan Oliva-Moreno; Julio Lopez-Bastida; Melany Worbes-Cerezo; Pedro Serrano-Aguilar
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  [Health technology assessment for decision-making in Latin America: good practice principles].

Authors:  Andrés Pichon-Riviere; Natalie C Soto; Federico Ariel Augustovski; Sebastián García Martí; Laura Sampietro-Colom
Journal:  Rev Panam Salud Publica       Date:  2018-02-19

Review 5.  Specific barriers to the conduct of randomised clinical trials on medical devices.

Authors:  Edmund A M Neugebauer; Ana Rath; Sunya-Lee Antoine; Michaela Eikermann; Doerthe Seidel; Carsten Koenen; Esther Jacobs; Dawid Pieper; Martine Laville; Séverine Pitel; Cecilia Martinho; Snezana Djurisic; Jacques Demotes-Mainard; Christine Kubiak; Vittorio Bertele; Janus C Jakobsen; Silvio Garattini; Christian Gluud
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 2.279

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.