Literature DB >> 12391940

Preference-based outcome measures in cost-utility analyses. A 20-year overview.

Dan Greenberg1, Joseph S Pliskin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The study evaluated the extent to which quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and healthy-years equivalents (HYEs) were used in cost-utility studies over the past 20 years (1981-2000) as well as possible changes in the quality of journals reporting cost-utility studies.
METHODS: Cost-utility studies were identified through an electronic search. For each study the journal name, date of publication, article's language and research origin, and the journal's impact factor were recorded.
RESULTS: The number of published cost-utility studies increased in the last 20 years but has leveled off in 1997. Most studies were performed in the United States and were published in English. All studies except one used QALYs as an outcome measure. The mean journal's impact factor has changed slightly over the years.
CONCLUSIONS: Cost-utility studies would possibly gain more popularity if they were used as a vehicle in the decision-making process regarding healthcare budgets and were more visible in the scientific literature.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12391940

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  6 in total

1.  Chilean population norms derived from the health-related quality of Life SF-6D.

Authors:  Miguel A Garcia-Gordillo; Daniel Collado-Mateo; Pedro R Olivares; José C Adsuar
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2017-06-19

2.  Measuring preferences for cost-utility analysis: how choice of method may influence decision-making.

Authors:  Christine M McDonough; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Evolution of the Modified Rankin Scale and Its Use in Future Stroke Trials.

Authors:  Joseph P Broderick; Opeolu Adeoye; Jordan Elm
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 4.  HEE-GER: a systematic review of German economic evaluations of health care published 1990-2004.

Authors:  David L B Schwappach; Till A Boluarte
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  What is the value of social values? The uselessness of assessing health-related quality of life through preference measures.

Authors:  Luis Prieto; José A Sacristán
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Valuation study for a preference-based quality of life measure for dental caries (Dental Caries Utility Index - DCUI) among Australian adolescents - study protocol.

Authors:  Ruvini Hettiarachchi; Sanjeewa Kularatna; Joshua Byrnes; Brendan Mulhern; Gang Chen; Paul A Scuffham
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.