Literature DB >> 12391793

Imitative learning in Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) using the bidirectional control procedure.

Chana K Akins1, Emily D Klein, Thomas R Zentall.   

Abstract

In the bidirectional control procedure, observers are exposed to a conspecific demonstrator responding to a manipulandum in one of two directions (e.g., left vs. right). This procedure controls for socially mediated effects (the mere presence of a conspecific) and stimulus enhancement (attention drawn to a manipulandum by its movement), and it has the added advantage of being symmetrical (the two different responses are similar in topography). Imitative learning is demonstrated when the observers make the response in the direction that they observed it being made. Recently, however, it has been suggested that when such evidence is found with a predominantly olfactory animal, such as the rat, it may result artifactually from odor cues left on one side of the manipulandum by the demonstrator. In the present experiment, we found that Japanese quail, for which odor cues are not likely to play a role, also showed significant correspondence between the direction in which the demonstrator and the observer push a screen to gain access to reward. Furthermore, control quail that observed the screen move, when the movement of the screen was not produced by the demonstrator, did not show similar correspondence between the direction of screen movement observed and that performed by the observer. Thus, with the appropriate control, the bidirectional procedure appears to be useful for studying imitation in avian species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12391793     DOI: 10.3758/bf03192836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Learn Behav        ISSN: 0090-4996


  9 in total

1.  Current issues and emerging theories in animal cognition.

Authors:  S T Boysen; G T Himes
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  A method for the objective study of tool-using behavior.

Authors:  R W Powell; W Kelly
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Imitation learning in budgerigars: Dawson and Foss (1965) revisited.

Authors:  B G Galef; L A Manzig; R M Field
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Observational learning in budgerigars.

Authors:  B V Dawson; B M Foss
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1965-10       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Stimulus learning and response learning by observation in the European starling, in a two-object/two-action test.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Imitative learning in Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) depends on the motivational state of the observer quail at the time of observation.

Authors:  B R Dorrance; T R Zentall
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.231

7.  Imitative learning in male Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) using the two-action method.

Authors:  C K Akins; T R Zentall
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.231

8.  Observational learning and social facilitation in the rat.

Authors:  T R Zentall; J M Levine
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-12-15       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  A demonstration of observational learning in rats using a bidirectional control.

Authors:  C M Heyes; G R Dawson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  1990-02
  9 in total
  12 in total

1.  Imitation of a two-action sequence by pigeons.

Authors:  Nam H Nguyen; Emily D Klein; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-06

2.  Locomotor adaptation is modulated by observing the actions of others.

Authors:  Mitesh Patel; R Edward Roberts; Mohammed U Riyaz; Maroof Ahmed; David Buckwell; Karen Bunday; Hena Ahmad; Diego Kaski; Qadeer Arshad; Adolfo M Bronstein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Social facilitation of d-amphetamine self-administration in rats.

Authors:  Cassandra D Gipson; Justin R Yates; Joshua S Beckmann; Julie A Marusich; Thomas R Zentall; Michael T Bardo
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 3.157

4.  Peer influences on drug self-administration: an econometric analysis in socially housed rats.

Authors:  Geoffrey W Peitz; Justin C Strickland; Elizabeth G Pitts; Mark Foley; Scott Tonidandel; Mark A Smith
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.293

5.  The importance of witnessed agency in chimpanzee social learning of tool use.

Authors:  Lydia M Hopper; Susan P Lambeth; Steven J Schapiro; Andrew Whiten
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Pre- and post-natal stress have opposing effects on social information use.

Authors:  Neeltje J Boogert; Cedric Zimmer; Karen A Spencer
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Operant behavior can be triggered by the position of the rat relative to objects rotating on an inaccessible platform.

Authors:  E Pastalkova; E Kelemen; J Bures
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-02-10       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Imitation and emulation by dogs using a bidirectional control procedure.

Authors:  Holly C Miller; Rebecca Rayburn-Reeves; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2008-10-11       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 9.  Action imitation in birds.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.986

10.  Observational learning in chimpanzees and children studied through 'ghost' conditions.

Authors:  Lydia M Hopper; Susan P Lambeth; Steven J Schapiro; Andrew Whiten
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.