Literature DB >> 12391208

Efficient priming of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells by DNA vaccination depends on appropriate targeting of sufficient levels of immunologically relevant antigen to appropriate processing pathways.

Catherine Rush1, Tim Mitchell, Paul Garside.   

Abstract

The initial cellular events and interactions that occur following DNA immunization are likely to be key to determining the character and magnitude of the resulting immune response, and as such, a better understanding of these events could ultimately lead to the design of more effective pathogen-appropriate DNA vaccines. Therefore, we have used a variety of sensitive cell-based techniques to study the induction of adaptive immunity in vivo. We examined the efficacy of induction of Ag-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell responses in vivo by the adoptive transfer of fluorescently labeled Ag-specific TCR transgenic T cells and have demonstrated how such approaches can be used to study the effect of simple DNA construct manipulations on immunological priming. OVA-specific CD8(+) and CD4(+) T cells were activated and divided in vivo following immunization with DNA constructs that targeted OVA expression to different subcellular locations; however, the kinetics and degree of cell proliferation were dependent on the cellular location of the expressed protein. DNA vectors encoding cell-associated OVA resulted in greater CD8(+) T cell division compared with other forms of OVA. In contrast, soluble secreted OVA targeted to the classical secretory pathway enhanced division of CD4(+) T cells. Furthermore, the inclusion of mammalian introns to enhance protein expression increased the ability of poorly immunogenic forms of Ag to activate naive T cells, indicating that not only the location, but also the amount of Ag expression, is important for efficient T cell priming following DNA injection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12391208     DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.9.4951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunol        ISSN: 0022-1767            Impact factor:   5.422


  19 in total

1.  Optimization of codon usage enhances the immunogenicity of a DNA vaccine encoding mycobacterial antigen Ag85B.

Authors:  Hyun-Jeong Ko; Sung-Youl Ko; Yeon-Jeong Kim; Eun-Gae Lee; Sang-Nae Cho; Chang-Yuil Kang
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Comparison of different live vaccine strategies in vivo for delivery of protein antigen or antigen-encoding DNA and mRNA by virulence-attenuated Listeria monocytogenes.

Authors:  Daniela I M Loeffler; Christoph U Schoen; Werner Goebel; Sabine Pilgrim
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  Multimeric soluble CD40 ligand and GITR ligand as adjuvants for human immunodeficiency virus DNA vaccines.

Authors:  Geoffrey W Stone; Suzanne Barzee; Victoria Snarsky; Kristin Kee; Celsa A Spina; Xiao-Fang Yu; Richard S Kornbluth
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  Uptake and presentation of exogenous antigen and presentation of endogenously produced antigen by skin dendritic cells represent equivalent pathways for the priming of cellular immune responses following biolistic DNA immunization.

Authors:  Stephan Sudowe; Sabine Dominitzki; Evelyn Montermann; Matthias Bros; Stephan Grabbe; Angelika B Reske-Kunz
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 7.397

5.  Vaccination with the recombinant Brucella outer membrane protein 31 or a derived 27-amino-acid synthetic peptide elicits a CD4+ T helper 1 response that protects against Brucella melitensis infection.

Authors:  Juliana Cassataro; Silvia M Estein; Karina A Pasquevich; Carlos A Velikovsky; Silvia de la Barrera; Raúl Bowden; Carlos A Fossati; Guillermo H Giambartolomei
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  HIV latency can be established in proliferating and nonproliferating resting CD4+ T cells in vitro: implications for latency reversal.

Authors:  Michael A Moso; Jenny L Anderson; Samantha Adikari; Lachlan R Gray; Georges Khoury; Judy J Chang; Jonathan C Jacobson; Anne M Ellett; Wan-Jung Cheng; Suha Saleh; John J Zaunders; Damian F J Purcell; Paul U Cameron; Melissa J Churchill; Sharon R Lewin; Hao K Lu
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.177

7.  The signal peptide sequence impacts the immune response elicited by a DNA epitope vaccine.

Authors:  Dimitrios Vatakis; Minnie McMillan
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2011-08-10

8.  Human self-protein CD8+ T-cell epitopes are both positively and negatively selected.

Authors:  Michal Almani; Shai Raffaeli; Tal Vider-Shalit; Lea Tsaban; Vered Fishbain; Yoram Louzoun
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.532

9.  X4 human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120 down-modulates expression and immunogenicity of codelivered antigens.

Authors:  Avi-Hai Hovav; Michael Santosuosso; Maytal Bivas-Benita; Andre Plair; Alex Cheng; Mazal Elnekave; Elda Righi; Tao Chen; Satoshi Kashiwagi; Michael W Panas; Shi-Hua Xiang; Karina Furmanov; Norman L Letvin; Mark C Poznansky
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  A detailed characterisation of the distribution and presentation of DNA vaccine encoded antigen.

Authors:  Catherine M Rush; Timothy J Mitchell; Paul Garside
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 3.641

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.