Literature DB >> 12390992

Impact of community neonatal services: a multicentre survey.

D Langley1, S Hollis, T Friede, D MacGregor, A Gatrell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore the impact of a community neonatal service on high risk infant survivors in the first year of life.
DESIGN: Retrospective multicentre survey. Postal questionnaires were sent to selected parents.
SETTING: Thirty two neonatal units in England and Wales. INCLUSION CRITERIA: infants over 12 months of age with birth weight < or =1500 g, or who received level I intensive care for at least 48 hours. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: multiple births, infants who had died or had severe congenital abnormalities. A total of 3367 eligible infants were selected, and their parents were sent a questionnaire; 65% responded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Length of stay on the neonatal unit from birth to initial discharge. Readmission to hospital during the first year of life.
RESULTS: The median length of stay in units with a community neonatal service was 35 days compared with 37 days in units without. When adjusted for infant and parent characteristics, the median length of stay was reduced by 12.6% where a community neonatal service was provided (95% confidence interval 5.3% to 19.3%). The readmission rates were 44.6% in units with a community neonatal service and 43.5% in units without. There was no significant reduction in the adjusted odds of readmission.
CONCLUSIONS: The retrospective nature of this study means that these findings cannot be definitely attributed to the presence of a community neonatal service. However, the results suggest that community neonatal services may reduce the length of stay without any subsequent increase in readmission.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12390992      PMCID: PMC1721488          DOI: 10.1136/fn.87.3.f204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed        ISSN: 1359-2998            Impact factor:   5.747


  19 in total

Review 1.  How should cost data in pragmatic randomised trials be analysed?

Authors:  S G Thompson; J A Barber
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-29

2.  Sample size requirements for stratified cluster randomization designs.

Authors:  A Donner
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Early discharge of low birthweight infants.

Authors:  F Lefebvre; A Veilleux; H Bard
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 4.  The long-term costs of preterm birth and low birth weight: results of a systematic review.

Authors:  S Petrou; T Sach; L Davidson
Journal:  Child Care Health Dev       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.508

5.  Early discharge of preterm infants needing limited special care, followed by domiciliary nursing care.

Authors:  A Ortenstrand; U Waldenström; B Winbladh
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.299

6.  A randomized clinical trial of early hospital discharge and home follow-up of very-low-birth-weight infants.

Authors:  D Brooten; S Kumar; L P Brown; P Butts; S A Finkler; S Bakewell-Sachs; A Gibbons; M Delivoria-Papadopoulos
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-10-09       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Rehospitalization in the first year of life for high-risk survivors.

Authors:  M C McCormick; S Shapiro; B H Starfield
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Costs and benefits of a community special care baby service.

Authors:  J M Couriel; P Davies
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-04-09

9.  Late morbidity of very low birthweight infants.

Authors:  M E Imogen Morgan
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-07-20

10.  Birth weight and hospital admission before the age of 2 years.

Authors:  L Mutch; H Ashurst; A Macfarlane
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.791

View more
  1 in total

1.  Hospital-to-Home Interventions, Use, and Satisfaction: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michelle Y Hamline; Rebecca L Speier; Paul Dai Vu; Daniel Tancredi; Alia R Broman; Lisa N Rasmussen; Brian P Tullius; Ulfat Shaikh; Su-Ting T Li
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 7.124

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.