Literature DB >> 10519348

Early discharge of preterm infants needing limited special care, followed by domiciliary nursing care.

A Ortenstrand1, U Waldenström, B Winbladh.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of early discharge, followed by domiciliary nursing care, on infant health and utilization of health services in preterm infants still in need of special care (mainly gavage feeding). In total, 88 infants who were physiologically stable, but in need of further special care such as gavage feeding, were allocated to an early discharge group (EDG = 45 infants) and offered home visits by a nurse backed up by a neonatologist, or to a control group offered standard neonatal care (CG = 43 infants). Infants in the EDG spent 30.6 d (mean) in hospital after birth compared with 46.3 d in the CG (p = 0.003). On average, the domiciliary nurse spent 10.4 h with each family in the EDG, including a median number of 5 home visits, scheduled telephone contact and travelling time. The infants had a mean of 1.7 scheduled visits and 0.4 unscheduled visits to the neonatal ward. The domiciliary nurse received a mean of 0.9 telephone calls from the parents. When the period of domiciliary care in the EDG (post-conceptional age 35.9-38.7 wk) was compared with the corresponding time in hospital in the CG (post-conceptional age 35.6-38.6 wk), no statistical differences were observed in infant health, surgical procedures or medication. However, a reduced incidence of respiratory infections was observed in the EDG (6 versus 16 infants; p = 0.02). Nine infants in the EDG were re-hospitalized. The two groups did not differ in the numbers of rehospitalizations and non-elective contacts with the health services during the first year after discharge. In conclusion, early discharge of preterm infants still requiring special care, followed by domiciliary nursing care, was associated neither with an increased utilization of health services after discharge, nor with infant morbidity after discharge. More information on safety is needed before widespread early discharge can be advocated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10519348     DOI: 10.1080/08035259950168568

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Paediatr        ISSN: 0803-5253            Impact factor:   2.299


  13 in total

Review 1.  Early discharge with home support of gavage feeding for stable preterm infants who have not established full oral feeds.

Authors:  Carmel T Collins; Maria Makrides; Andrew J McPhee
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-08

2.  Outcomes of Infants With Home Tube Feeding: Comparing Nasogastric vs Gastrostomy Tubes.

Authors:  Syed Tariq Khalil; Michael R Uhing; Lori Duesing; Alexis Visotcky; Sergey Tarima; T Hang Nghiem-Rao
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 3.  Infants admitted to neonatal units--interventions to improve breastfeeding outcomes: a systematic review 1990-2007.

Authors:  Rhona J McInnes; Julie Chambers
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Creation of a Standard Model for Tube Feeding at Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Discharge.

Authors:  Benjamin R White; Anna Ermarth; Debbie Thomas; Olivia Arguinchona; Angela P Presson; Con Yee Ling
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Impact of community neonatal services: a multicentre survey.

Authors:  D Langley; S Hollis; T Friede; D MacGregor; A Gatrell
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.747

6.  Telemedicine in Neonatal Home Care: Identifying Parental Needs Through Participatory Design.

Authors:  Kristina Garne; Anne Brødsgaard; Gitte Zachariassen; Jane Clemensen
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2016-07-08

7.  Multicentre randomised study of the effect and experience of an early inhome programme (PreHomeCare) for preterm infants using video consultation and smartphone applications compared with inhospital consultations: protocol of the PreHomeCare study.

Authors:  Mai-Britt Hägi-Pedersen; Annelise Norlyk; Ram Dessau; Hristo Stanchev; Hanne Kronborg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  National and regional trends in gastrostomy in very low birth weight infants in the USA: 2000-2012.

Authors:  L Dupree Hatch; Theresa A Scott; William F Walsh; Adam B Goldin; Martin L Blakely; Stephen W Patrick
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 2.521

9.  Impact of prematurity and co-morbidities on feeding milestones in neonates: a retrospective study.

Authors:  S R Jadcherla; M Wang; A S Vijayapal; S R Leuthner
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 2.521

10.  Participatory design methods for the development of a clinical telehealth service for neonatal homecare.

Authors:  Kristina Garne Holm; Anne Brødsgaard; Gitte Zachariassen; Anthony C Smith; Jane Clemensen
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2017-09-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.