Literature DB >> 12388022

Cost-effectiveness of cataract surgery. Method to assess cost-effectiveness using registry data.

Gisela Kobelt1, Mats Lundström, Ulf Stenevi.   

Abstract

To develop a method to estimate the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained with cataract surgery using large patient registries.Four centers in Sweden. Five hundred patients scheduled for cataract extraction in 1 eye at 1 of 4 centers in Sweden during March 1999 were asked to complete the EQ-5D, a preference-based quality-of-life instrument, and the Catquest, a disease-specific disability measure, before surgery. Multiple regression analysis was used to study the correlation between utility and visual acuity and/or disability and utility and QALY gain through the intervention estimated. Visual acuity and Catquest scores were available for 484 patients. The mean age was 76.1 years; the mean logMAR visual acuity was 0.59 in the surgical eye and 0.26 in the other eye. The mean Catquest disability score was 13.79 and the mean utility, 0.74. Utilities correlated significantly with visual acuity and disability scores, and the correlations remained significant when both were included in a regression model, indicating that the 2 measure different concepts. The hypothetical cost per QALY gained (discounted at 3%) was estimated at 45000 SKr (4500 US dollars) using the Swedish Cataract Registry. The results indicate that visual acuity and visual disability significantly affect utilities controlled for age and ophthalmic comorbidity. It is thus possible to use data on visual acuity and disability in large registries to estimate the cost-effectiveness of cataract surgery and to compare the cost per QALY gained with other health care interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12388022     DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(02)01220-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  10 in total

Review 1.  Global registries for measuring pharmacoeconomic and quality-of-life outcomes: focus on design and data collection, analysis and interpretation.

Authors:  Lisa Kennedy; Ann-Marie Craig
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Self assessed benefit of cataract extraction.

Authors:  N Congdon
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Cost-effectiveness of cataract surgery in Japan.

Authors: 
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Duration of self assessed benefit of cataract extraction: a long term study.

Authors:  M Lundström; E Wendel
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Cost-utility analysis of cataract surgery in Japan: a probabilistic Markov modeling study.

Authors:  Yoshimune Hiratsuka; Masakazu Yamada; Yoko Akune; Akira Murakami; Annabelle A Okada; Hidetoshi Yamashita; Yuichi Ohashi; Naoya Yamagishi; Hiroshi Tamura; Shunichi Fukuhara; Tomoyuki Takura
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Determinants of patient satisfaction with cataract surgery and length of time on the waiting list.

Authors:  B L Conner-Spady; S Sanmugasunderam; P Courtright; J J McGurran; T W Noseworthy
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Cost-utility of routine cataract surgery.

Authors:  Pirjo Räsänen; Kari Krootila; Harri Sintonen; Tiina Leivo; Anna-Maija Koivisto; Olli-Pekka Ryynänen; Marja Blom; Risto P Roine
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  Cost-effectiveness of eye care services in Zambia.

Authors:  Ulla K Griffiths; Fiammetta M Bozzani; Adrian Gheorghe; Lawrence Mwenge; Clare Gilbert
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2014-02-25

9.  The quality of life impact of peripheral versus central vision loss with a focus on glaucoma versus age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Keith Evans; Simon K Law; John Walt; Patricia Buchholz; Jan Hansen
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-08-03

10.  Assessing the construct validity and responsiveness of Preference-Based Measures (PBMs) in cataract surgery patients.

Authors:  Katie Breheny; William Hollingworth; Rebecca Kandiyali; Padraig Dixon; Abi Loose; Pippa Craggs; Mariusz Grzeda; John Sparrow
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 4.147

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.