Literature DB >> 12386742

Multisensory fusion and the stochastic structure of postural sway.

Tim Kiemel1, Kelvin S Oie, John J Jeka.   

Abstract

We analyze the stochastic structure of postural sway and demonstrate that this structure imposes important constraints on models of postural control. Linear stochastic models of various orders were fit to the center-of-mass trajectories of subjects during quiet stance in four sensory conditions: (i) light touch and vision, (ii) light touch, (iii) vision, and (iv) neither touch nor vision. For each subject and condition, the model of appropriate order was determined, and this model was characterized by the eigenvalues and coefficients of its autocovariance function. In most cases, postural-sway trajectories were similar to those produced by a third-order model with eigenvalues corresponding to a slow first-order decay plus a faster-decaying damped oscillation. The slow-decay fraction, which we define as the slow-decay autocovariance coefficient divided by the total variance, was usually near 1. We compare the stochastic structure of our data to two linear control-theory models: (i) a proportional-integral-derivative control model in which the postural system's state is assumed to be known, and (ii) an optimal-control model in which the system's state is estimated based on noisy multisensory information using a Kalman filter. Under certain assumptions, both models have eigenvalues consistent with our results. However, the slow-decay fraction predicted by both models is less than we observe. We show that our results are more consistent with a modification of the optimal-control model in which noise is added to the computations performed by the state estimator. This modified model has a slow-decay fraction near 1 in a parameter regime in which sensory information related to the body's velocity is more accurate than sensory information related to position and acceleration. These findings suggest that: (i) computation noise is responsible for much of the variance observed in postural sway, and (ii) the postural control system under the conditions tested resides in the regime of accurate velocity information.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12386742     DOI: 10.1007/s00422-002-0333-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Cybern        ISSN: 0340-1200            Impact factor:   2.086


  60 in total

1.  Balancing on tightropes and slacklines.

Authors:  P Paoletti; L Mahadevan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  The many roles of vision during walking.

Authors:  David Logan; Tim Kiemel; Nadia Dominici; Germana Cappellini; Yuri Ivanenko; Francesco Lacquaniti; John J Jeka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Nonlinear postural control in response to visual translation.

Authors:  Elena Ravaioli; Kelvin S Oie; Tim Kiemel; Lorenzo Chiari; John J Jeka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The temporal organization of posture changes during the first year of independent walking.

Authors:  J S Metcalfe; L-C Chen; T-Y Chang; K McDowell; J J Jeka; J E Clark
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Joint coordination during quiet stance: effects of vision.

Authors:  Vijaya Krishnamoorthy; Jeng-Feng Yang; John P Scholz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Slow dynamics of postural sway are in the feedback loop.

Authors:  Tim Kiemel; Kelvin S Oie; John J Jeka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Multisensory information for postural control: sway-referencing gain shapes center of pressure variability and temporal dynamics.

Authors:  Sean Clark; Michael A Riley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Multisensory reweighting of vision and touch is intact in healthy and fall-prone older adults.

Authors:  Leslie K Allison; Tim Kiemel; John J Jeka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The relationship of asymmetric weight-bearing with postural sway and visual reliance in stroke.

Authors:  Daniel S Marigold; Janice J Eng
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.840

10.  Postural control in children. Coupling to dynamic somatosensory information.

Authors:  José A Barela; John J Jeka; Jane E Clark
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.