Literature DB >> 12386477

Best Evidence Medical Education.

R.M. Harden1, Janet Grant, Graham Buckley, I.R. Hart.   

Abstract

There is a need to move from opinion-based education to evidence-based education. Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) is the implementation, by teachers in their practice, of methods and approaches to education based on the best evidence available. It involves a professional judgement by the teacher about their teaching taking into account a number of factors - the QUESTS dimensions. The Quality of the research evidence available - how reliable is the evidence?, the Utility of the evidence - can the methods be transferred and adopted without modification?, the Extent of the evidence, the Strength of the evidence, the Target or outcomes measured - how valid is the evidence? and the Setting or context - how relevant is the evidence?The evidence available can be graded on each of the six dimensions. In the ideal situation the evidence is high on all six dimensions, but this is rarely found. Usually the evidence may be good in some respects, but poor in others. The teacher has to balance the different dimensions and come to a decision on a course of action based on his or her professional judgement.The QUESTS dimensions highlight a number of tensions with regard to the evidence in medical education: quality v relevance; quality v validity; and utility v the setting or context. The different dimensions reflect the nature of research and innovation. Best Evidence Medical Education encourages a culture or ethos in which decision making takes place in this context.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 12386477     DOI: 10.1023/A:1009896431203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract        ISSN: 1382-4996            Impact factor:   3.853


  15 in total

1.  An emerging renaissance in medical education.

Authors:  William T Branch; David E Kern
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Geriatric pharmacology and pharmacotherapy education for health professionals and students: a systematic review.

Authors:  Carolina J P W Keijsers; Larissa van Hensbergen; Lotte Jacobs; Jacobus R B J Brouwers; Dick J de Wildt; Olle Th J ten Cate; Paul A F Jansen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Undergraduate medical education as a foundation for health care and research.

Authors:  Martin R Fischer
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 4.  Undergraduate medical education in substance abuse: a review of the quality of the literature.

Authors:  Devyani Kothari; Marc N Gourevitch; Joshua D Lee; Ellie Grossman; Andrea Truncali; Tavinder K Ark; Adina L Kalet
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Senator Bill Frist and the medical jeremiad.

Authors:  Benjamin R Bates
Journal:  J Med Humanit       Date:  2005

6.  Redefining Quality in Medical Education Research: A Consumer's View.

Authors:  Gail M Sullivan; Deborah Simpson; David A Cook; Nicole M DeIorio; Kathryn Andolsek; Lawrence Opas; Ingrid Philibert; Lalena M Yarris
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2014-09

7.  Systematic Reviews in Medical Education.

Authors:  Lauren A Maggio; Anita Samuel; Elizabeth Stellrecht
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2022-04-14

8.  A survey of graduates' perceptions on a Chinese medical school's traditional and reform curricula.

Authors:  Renslow Sherer; Hongmei Dong; Feng Yu; Jingyi Fan; Jinxin Li; Ivy Jiang; Brian Cooper; Jonathan Lio; Yunfeng Zhou; Jiong Yang; Baoping Yu; Xiangting Yu
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2016-07-19

9.  Research priorities in medical education: A national study.

Authors:  Mina Tootoonchi; Nikoo Yamani; Tahereh Changiz; Alireza Yousefy
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.852

10.  An instrument for evaluating clinical teaching in Japan: content validity and cultural sensitivity.

Authors:  Makoto Kikukawa; Renee E Stalmeijer; Sei Emura; Sue Roff; Albert J J A Scherpbier
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.