Literature DB >> 12386366

The spinal needle test effectively measures abdominal wall thickness before cannula placement at laparoscopy.

Magdy P Milad1, Mary Faith Terkildsen.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the usefulness of the spinal needle test at laparoscopy to correlate abdominal wall thickness at initial entry sites with body mass index (BMI).
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification).
SETTING: University-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred thirty-eight women. INTERVENTION: Diagnostic laparoscopy.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: After CO(2) insufflation, the spinal needle test was performed by inserting a spinal needle attached to a partially filled syringe and advancing it perpendicular to the skin until the gas pocket was reached. To improve precision, the distance was measured 3 times at two sites, the umbilicus and Palmer's point (left upper quadrant). Patients' mean BMI was 25.8 kg/m(2) (range 17.2-60.0 kg/m(2)), with 24 (17%) considered clinically obese (BMI > or =30 kg/m(2)). A significant correlation was noted between BMI and abdominal wall thickness at the umbilicus (R = 0.69) and left upper quadrant (R = 0.81). Excellent correlation was also noted between body weight and thickness at the two points (R = 0.72 and R = 0.78, respectively). The mean thickness at the umbilicus differed significantly between obese (3.0 +/- 1.2 cm) and nonobese women (1.7 +/- 0.7 cm, p <0.001); as did mean thickness at the left upper quadrant (4.4 +/- 1.0 vs 2.0 +/- 0.7 cm, p <0.001).
CONCLUSION: Thickness of the abdominal wall at umbilical and left upper quadrant entry sites correlates well with weight and BMI. Even among obese women, the distance to the pocket of gas after insufflation at either entry site is remarkably small.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12386366     DOI: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60529-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc        ISSN: 1074-3804


  7 in total

1.  Maximizing coupling strength of magnetically anchored surgical instruments: how thick can we go?

Authors:  Sara L Best; Richard Bergs; Makram Gedeon; Juan Paramo; Raul Fernandez; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Tissue compression analysis for magnetically anchored cautery dissector during single-site laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Lauren B Mashaud; Wareef Kabbani; Angel Caban; Sarah Best; Deborah C Hogg; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Richard Bergs; Heather Beardsley; Raul Fernandez; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Estimation of optimal pivot point for remote center of motion alignment in surgery.

Authors:  Benoît Rosa; Caspar Gruijthuijsen; Ben Van Cleynenbreugel; Jos Vander Sloten; Dominiek Reynaerts; Emmanuel Vander Poorten
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Comparison of two entry methods for laparoscopic port entry: technical point of view.

Authors:  Adriana Toro; Maurizio Mannino; Giovanni Cappello; Andrea Di Stefano; Isidoro Di Carlo
Journal:  Diagn Ther Endosc       Date:  2012-06-13

Review 5.  Magnetic anchor guidance for endoscopic submucosal dissection and other endoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Mohamed Mortagy; Neal Mehta; Mansour A Parsi; Seiichiro Abe; Tyler Stevens; John J Vargo; Yutaka Saito; Amit Bhatt
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Design of a Magnetically Anchored Laparoscope Using Miniature Ultrasonic Motors.

Authors:  Jingwu Li; Zhijun Sun; He Yan; Jinyan Chen
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 3.523

7.  Study of Individual Characteristic Abdominal Wall Thickness Based on Magnetic Anchored Surgical Instruments.

Authors:  Ding-Hui Dong; Wen-Yan Liu; Hai-Bo Feng; Yi-Li Fu; Shi Huang; Jun-Xi Xiang; Yi Lyu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.628

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.