Literature DB >> 12386360

Comparison of laparoscopic and conventional surgery in the treatment of early cervical cancer.

Chyi-Long Lee1, Kuan-Gen Huang, Smita Jain, Pei-Shan Lee, Yung-Kuei Soong.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To compare efficacy, results, and complications of laparoscopic-assisted radical hysterectomy (LARH) and pelvic lymphadenectomy with abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) and pelvic lymphadenectomy in management of early (stages 1a2, 1b) invasive cervical carcinoma.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
SETTING: University-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS: Sixty women enrolled for radical hysterectomy as most appropriate primary treatment. INTERVENTION: Radical hysterectomy performed by laparoscopy or laparotomy.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Thirty patients each underwent LARH and ARH. The groups did not differ in terms of age, weight, disease stage, operating time, and hospital stay. Mean blood loss was 962 +/- 543 ml for ARH and 450 +/- 284 ml for LARH. No laparoscopic procedure was converted to laparotomy. There was no significant difference in intraoperative and postoperative complications. There was no significant difference in recurrence rates.
CONCLUSION: LARH with pelvic lymphadenectomy does not increase recurrence rates and morbidity when performed by experienced endoscopists and oncologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12386360     DOI: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60523-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc        ISSN: 1074-3804


  6 in total

1.  Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy has higher risk of perioperative urologic complication than abdominal radical hysterectomy: a meta-analysis of 38 studies.

Authors:  Jong Ha Hwang; Bo Wook Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  The incidence of postoperative symptomatic lymphocele after pelvic lymphadenectomy between abdominal and laparoscopic approach: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jong Ha Hwang; Bo Wook Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 3.453

3.  Comparative evaluation of surgical stress of laparoscopically assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy and laparotomy for early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  Cai-Ying Hou; Xiu-Li Li; Feng Jiang; Rong Jie Gong; Xin Yu Guo; Yuan-Qing Yao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Trends in laparoscopic and robotic surgery among gynecologic oncologists: A survey update.

Authors:  Mohamed Mabrouk; Michael Frumovitz; Marilyn Greer; Sheena Sharma; Kathleen M Schmeler; Pamela T Soliman; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  A new technique of laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy optimizes perioperative outcome.

Authors:  Yonghong Lin; Li He; Youwen Mei
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.401

6.  Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer.

Authors:  Farr R Nezhat; M Shoma Datta; Connie Liu; Linus Chuang; Konstantin Zakashansky
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2008 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.