Literature DB >> 12385640

Bystander and delayed effects after fractionated radiation exposure.

Carmel Mothersill1, C B Seymour.   

Abstract

Human immortalized keratinocytes were exposed to a range of single or fractionated doses of gamma rays from (60)Co, to medium harvested from donor cells exposed to these protocols, or to a combination of radiation and irradiated cell conditioned medium (ICCM). The surviving fractions after direct irradiation or exposure to ICCM were determined using a clonogenic assay. The results show that medium harvested from cultures receiving fractionated irradiation gave lower "recovery factors" than direct fractionated irradiation, where normal split-dose recovery occurred. The recovery factor is defined here as the surviving fraction of the cells receiving two doses (direct or ICCM) separated by an interval of 2 h divided by the surviving fraction of cells receiving the same dose in one exposure. After treatment with ICCM, the recovery factors were less than 1 over a range of total doses from 5 mGy-5 Gy. Varying the time between doses from 10 min to 180 min did not alter the effect of ICCM, suggesting that two exposures to ICCM are more toxic than one irrespective of the dose used to generate the response. In certain protocols using mixtures of direct irradiation and ICCM, it was possible to eliminate the bystander effect. If bystander factors are produced in vivo, then they may reduce the sparing effect of the dose fractionation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12385640     DOI: 10.1667/0033-7587(2002)158[0626:badeaf]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  25 in total

1.  Modeling DNA double-strand break repair kinetics as an epiregulated cell-community-wide (epicellcom) response to radiation stress.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Radiation Induced Bystander Effect in vivo.

Authors:  Yunfei Chai; Tom K Hei
Journal:  Acta Med Nagasaki       Date:  2008

Review 3.  Radiation-induced bystander signalling in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Kevin M Prise; Joe M O'Sullivan
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  Radiation-induced bystander effects: evidence for an adaptive response to low dose exposures?

Authors:  Carmel Mothersill; Colin Seymour
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Responses to low doses of ionizing radiation in biological systems.

Authors:  Ludwig E Feinendegen; Myron Pollycove; Charles A Sondhaus
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2004-07

6.  Investigation of non-linear adaptive responses and split dose recovery induced by ionizing radiation in three human epithelial derived cell lines.

Authors:  Lorna A Ryan; Colin B Seymour; Carmel E Mothersill
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 7.  Bystander effects and radiotherapy.

Authors:  Alicia Marín; Margarita Martín; Olga Liñán; Felipe Alvarenga; Mario López; Laura Fernández; David Büchser; Laura Cerezo
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2014-08-28

Review 8.  Genetic and epigenetic features in radiation sensitivity Part I: cell signalling in radiation response.

Authors:  Michel H Bourguignon; Pablo A Gisone; Maria R Perez; Severino Michelin; Diana Dubner; Marina Di Giorgio; Edgardo D Carosella
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Emerging role of radiation induced bystander effects: Cell communications and carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Rajamanickam Baskar
Journal:  Genome Integr       Date:  2010-09-12

10.  Ionizing radiation-induced bystander mutagenesis and adaptation: quantitative and temporal aspects.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Junqing Zhou; Joseph Baldwin; Kathryn D Held; Kevin M Prise; Robert W Redmond; Howard L Liber
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 2.433

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.