Literature DB >> 12385502

Oxidative DNA damage: biological significance and methods of analysis.

Gunther Guetens1, Gert De Boeck, Martin Highley, Allan T van Oosterom, Ernst A de Bruijn.   

Abstract

All forms of aerobic life are subjected constantly to oxidant pressure from molecular oxygen and also reactive oxygen species (ROS), produced during the biochemical utilization of O2 and prooxidant stimulation of O2 metabolism. ROS are thought to influence the development of human cancer and more than 50 other human diseases. To prevent oxidative DNA damage (protection) or to reverse damage, thereby preventing mutagenesis and cancer (repair), the aerobic cell possesses antioxidant defense systems and DNA repair mechanisms. During the last 20 years, many analytical techniques have been developed to monitor oxidative DNA base damage. High-performance liquid chromatography-electrochemical detection and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry are the two pioneering contributions to the field. Currently, the arsenal of methods available include the promising high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry technique, capillary electrophoresis, 32P-postlabeling, fluorescence postlabeling, 3H-postlabeling, antibody-base immunoassays, and assays involving the use of DNA repair glycosylases such as the comet assay, the alkaline elution assay, and the alkaline unwinding method. Recently, the use of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry has been introduced for the measurement of a number of modified nucleosides in oxidatively damaged DNA. The bulk of available chromatographic methods aimed at measuring individual DNA base lesions require either chemical hydrolysis or enzymatic digestion of oxidized DNA, following extraction from cells or tissues. The effect of experimental conditions (DNA isolation, hydrolysis, and/or derivatization) on the levels of oxidatively modified bases in DNA is enormous and has been studied intensively in the last 10 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12385502     DOI: 10.1080/10408360290795547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci        ISSN: 1040-8363            Impact factor:   6.250


  21 in total

1.  NRF2 antioxidant response protects against acidic bile salts-induced oxidative stress and DNA damage in esophageal cells.

Authors:  Dunfa Peng; Heng Lu; Shoumin Zhu; Zhangjian Zhou; Tianling Hu; Zheng Chen; Alexander Zaika; Wael El-Rifai
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 8.679

2.  8-Oxo-deoxyguanosine: reduce, reuse, recycle?

Authors:  Marcus S Cooke; Mark D Evans
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Accumulation of nuclear DNA damage or neuron loss: molecular basis for a new approach to understanding selective neuronal vulnerability in neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Ivona Brasnjevic; Patrick R Hof; Harry W M Steinbusch; Christoph Schmitz
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2008-05-23

Review 4.  Physiology of the read-write genome.

Authors:  James A Shapiro
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 5.  Salvage of oxidized guanine derivatives in the (2'-deoxy)ribonucleotide pool as source of mutations in DNA.

Authors:  Paul T Henderson; Mark D Evans; Marcus S Cooke
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Oxidative status in neuroblastoma: a source of stress?

Authors:  Nathan M Novotny; Jay L Grosfeld; Katharyn E Turner; Frederick J Rescorla; Xinzhu Pu; James E Klaunig; Robert J Hickey; Linda H Malkas; John A Sandoval
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.545

7.  Adenine oxidation by pyrite-generated hydroxyl radicals.

Authors:  Corey A Cohn; Shawn C Fisher; Bruce J Brownawell; Martin Aa Schoonen
Journal:  Geochem Trans       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 4.737

8.  Observation of DNA damage of human hepatoma cells irradiated by heavy ions using comet assay.

Authors:  Li-Mei Qiu; Wen-Jian Li; Xin-Yue Pang; Qing-Xiang Gao; Yan Feng; Li-Bin Zhou; Gao-Hua Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Correlates of antioxidant nutrients and oxidative DNA damage differ by race in a cross-sectional study of healthy African American and white adults.

Authors:  Joanne L Watters; Jessie A Satia; Lawrence L Kupper
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.315

10.  Sources of extracellular, oxidatively-modified DNA lesions: implications for their measurement in urine.

Authors:  Marcus S Cooke; Paul T Henderson; Mark D Evans
Journal:  J Clin Biochem Nutr       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 3.114

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.