Literature DB >> 12384761

Vertebral body compression fracture after removal of pedicle screws: a report of two cases.

Beat Waelchli1, Kan Min, Philippe Cathrein, Norbert Boos.   

Abstract

While the risks of pedicle screw insertion are well established, there is a paucity of reports on complications associated with implant removal. We report two cases of acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures of the instrumented vertebral body adjacent to the fractured vertebra due to removal of pedicle screws in two female patients previously treated for vertebral lumbar burst fractures. Both patients had experienced only mild occasional pain at the thoracolumbar junction prior to the removal of the implants. In the formerly almost asymptomatic individuals, the acute osteoporotic fractures led to persistent severe back pain despite prolonged intensive treatment. Patients must be thoroughly informed of the rare but potential risks of spinal implant removal, particularly in cases of osteoporosis. We therefore do not recommend removal of spinal implants unless there are clear clinical indications for implant removal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12384761      PMCID: PMC3611312          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-002-0417-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Is routine implant removal after trauma surgery sensible?].

Authors:  C Krettek; C Müller; R Meller; M Jagodzinski; F Hildebrand; R Gaulke
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  The benefits of elective spinal implant removal: a retrospective study of 137 patients.

Authors:  Thorsten Jentzsch; Vinicius Gomes de Lima; Burkhardt Seifert; Kai Sprengel; Clément M L Werner
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Clinical studies in spinal surgery.

Authors:  Beate Hanson; Branko Kopjar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Metal levels in corrosion of spinal implants.

Authors:  Javier del Rio; Jose Beguiristain; Julio Duart
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Thoracolumbar fractures surgically treated by "in situ contouring".

Authors:  Jean-Paul Steib; Mourad Aoui; Anca Mitulescu; Ioan Bogorin; Xavier Chiffolot; Jean-Michel Cognet; Patrick Simon
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Clinical application of a pedicle nail system with polymethylmethacrylate for osteoporotic vertebral fracture.

Authors:  Keiya Yamana; Masato Tanaka; Yoshihisa Sugimoto; Tomoyuki Takigawa; Toshifumi Ozaki; Hitoshi Konishi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Spinal metallosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yoni Goldenberg; Jin W Tee; Cesar M Salinas-La Rosa; Michael Murphy
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Grafted vertebral fracture after implant removal in a patient with spine-shortening vertebral osteotomy.

Authors:  Hiroaki Nakashima; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Keigo Ito; Masaaki Machino; Shunsuke Kanbara; Daigo Morita; Shiro Imagama; Naoki Ishiguro; Fumihiko Kato
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.131

9.  Vertebral body compression fracture after percutaneous pedicle screw removal in a young man.

Authors:  M Cappuccio; F De Iure; L Amendola; A Martucci
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-11-23

10.  Fusion versus nonfusion for surgically treated thoracolumbar burst fractures: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nai-Feng Tian; Yao-Sen Wu; Xiao-Lei Zhang; Xin-Lei Wu; Yong-Long Chi; Fang-Min Mao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.