Literature DB >> 12384739

Graf ligamentoplasty: a 7-year follow-up.

Alan Gardner1, Ketan C Pande.   

Abstract

Graf ligamentoplasty is seen as a means of stabilising and reducing the mobility of one or more severely symptomatic motion segments associated with degenerative disc disease. It is a less invasive procedure than fusion and appears to have a similar or slightly better success rate. Some studies have reported mixed results at early follow up; generally, they have suffered from poorly defined indications for the procedure, which are now much clearer. Reports on the first 50 patients undergoing Graf stabilisation in 1990/1991 were published in the European Spine Journal in 1995, with a 2-year follow-up. In the present study, the results of which were independently reviewed by the second author (K.C.P.), a spinal research fellow from an unrelated centre, we were able to establish postal contact with 40 of those patients, of whom 31 still had Graf instrumentation in situ. Examination of the clinical records of the ten non-responders when last seen indicated no particular bias of the results. The average age at surgery and average follow-up were 41.8 years (range 17.2-60 years) and 7.4 years (range 5.6-8.5 years) respectively. Excellent and good subjective results were reported in 62% of patients; 61% reported significant or total relief of low-back pain and 77% never or occasionally used analgesics. Patients were evaluated using the Oswestry Disability Score and the MSPQ (Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire) and Zung Depression Index with the DRAM (Disability and Risk Assessment Method). Additional information was obtained from the clinical notes and radiographs at last review. The mean Oswestry Disability Score was 59+/-10% pre-operatively and 37.7+/-14% after 7 years. There was a statistically significant correlation between the Oswestry scores and the subjective outcome (P=0.009). The results of this study suggest that the beneficial effects of Graf ligamentoplasty are sustained in the longer term in spite of the presence of an established degenerative process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12384739      PMCID: PMC3611572          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-002-0436-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  15 in total

1.  Dynamic stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion: part I. Biomechanical effects on lumbar spinal motion.

Authors:  Patrick Strube; Stephan Tohtz; Eike Hoff; Christian Gross; Carsten Perka; Michael Putzier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; Nagananda K Burra; Thomas Zander; Georg Bergmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Adjacent segment instability after treatment with a Graf ligament at minimum 8 years' followup.

Authors:  Yongsoo Choi; Kisoo Kim; Kwangyoung So
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Biomechanical analysis and design of a dynamic spinal fixator using topology optimization: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Hung-Ming Lin; Chien-Lin Liu; Yung-Ning Pan; Chang-Hung Huang; Shih-Liang Shih; Shun-Hwa Wei; Chen-Sheng Chen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus-associated cognitive impairment in a group of Hispanic women at risk for neurological impairment.

Authors:  Valerie Wojna; Richard L Skolasky; Rosa Hechavarría; Rául Mayo; Ola Selnes; Justin C McArthur; Loyda M Meléndez; Elizabeth Maldonado; Carmen D Zorrilla; Hermes García; Edmundo Kraiselburd; Avindra Nath
Journal:  J Neurovirol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.643

6.  Correlation between inter-vertebral disc morphology and the results in patients undergoing Graf ligament stabilisation.

Authors:  Zahid Askar; Douglas Wardlaw; Thillainayagamike Muthukumar; Frank Smith; Deiary Kader; Suzy Gibson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-06-12       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Minimum ten-year follow-up of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and dynamic stabilization.

Authors:  Kotryna Veresciagina; Arne Mehrkens; Stefan Schären; Bernhard Jeanneret
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-03

8.  Dynamic stabilization for challenging lumbar degenerative diseases of the spine: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Tuncay Kaner; Ali Fahir Ozer
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2013-04-15

9.  A short history of posterior dynamic stabilization.

Authors:  Cengiz Gomleksiz; Mehdi Sasani; Tunc Oktenoglu; Ali Fahir Ozer
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2012-12-26

10.  Role of dynesys as pedicle-based nonfusion stabilization for degenerative disc disorders.

Authors:  Neel Anand; Eli M Baron
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2012-12-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.