Literature DB >> 12383712

Defining the molecular and cellular basis of toxicity using comparative models.

Nazzareno Ballatori1, Alice R Villalobos.   

Abstract

A critical element of any experimental design is the selection of the model that will be used to test the hypothesis. As Claude Bernard proposed over 100 years ago "the solution of a physiological or pathological problem often depends solely on the appropriate choice of the animal for the experiment so as to make the result clear and searching." Likewise, the Danish physiologist August Krogh in 1929 wrote that "For a large number of problems there will be some animal of choice, or a few such animals, on which it can be most conveniently studied." This scientific principle has been validated repeatedly in the intervening years as investigators have described unique models that exploit natural differences in chemical and molecular structure, biochemical function, or physiological response between different cells, tissues, and organisms to address specific hypotheses. Despite the power of this comparative approach, investigators have generally been reluctant to utilize nonmammalian or nonclassical experimental models to address questions of human biology. The perception has been that studies in relatively simple or evolutionarily ancient organisms would provide little insight into "complex" human biology. This perception, although always somewhat misguided, is now even less tenable given the results of the genome sequencing projects, which demonstrate that the human genome is remarkably similar to that of evolutionarily ancient organisms. Thus, the various life forms on Earth share much more in common then anyone had previously envisioned. This realization provides additional rationale for the use of nonclassical experimental models and provides perhaps the strongest validation of Bernard's and Krogh's assertions. This overview emphasizes some of the special attributes of alternative animal models that may be exploited to define the molecular and cellular basis of toxicity. For each attribute, selected examples of animal models and experimental approaches are presented. It focuses on the areas of neurotoxicology, reproductive and developmental toxicology, organ systems toxicology, carcinogenesis, and functional genomics/toxicogenomics and highlights the use of fish, avian, Drosophila, Caenorhabditis elegans, and yeast models in such studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12383712     DOI: 10.1006/taap.2002.9488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol        ISSN: 0041-008X            Impact factor:   4.219


  13 in total

Review 1.  Modeling the function of bacterial virulence factors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Raphael H Valdivia
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2004-08

Review 2.  Cardiac developmental toxicity.

Authors:  Gretchen J Mahler; Jonathan T Butcher
Journal:  Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today       Date:  2011-12

3.  Establishing primary cultures of embryonic intestinal cells from the elasmobranch, Leucoraja erinacea.

Authors:  Nicole A Theodosiou; Angela Parton
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 2.416

4.  RNA in situ hybridization in whole mount embryos and cell histology adapted for marine elasmobranchs.

Authors:  Nicole A Theodosiou
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Methylmercury and diphenyl diselenide interactions in Drosophila melanogaster: effects on development, behavior, and Hg levels.

Authors:  Mayara B Leão; Paulo C C da Rosa; Caroline Wagner; Thiago H Lugokenski; Cristiane L Dalla Corte
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Gene expression patterns in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, exposed to a suite of model toxicants.

Authors:  Sharon E Hook; Ann D Skillman; Jack A Small; Irvin R Schultz
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  Community annotation and bioinformatics workforce development in concert--Little Skate Genome Annotation Workshops and Jamborees.

Authors:  Qinghua Wang; Cecilia N Arighi; Benjamin L King; Shawn W Polson; James Vincent; Chuming Chen; Hongzhan Huang; Brewster F Kingham; Shallee T Page; Marc Farnum Rendino; William Kelley Thomas; Daniel W Udwary; Cathy H Wu
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.451

8.  High concentration of vitamin E decreases thermosensation and thermotaxis learning and the underlying mechanisms in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Yiping Li; Yinxia Li; Qiuli Wu; Huayue Ye; Lingmei Sun; Boping Ye; Dayong Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD).

Authors:  Carolyn J Mattingly; Glenn T Colby; John N Forrest; James L Boyer
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Genomics and mapping of teleostei (bony fish).

Authors:  Melody S Clark
Journal:  Comp Funct Genomics       Date:  2003
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.