Literature DB >> 12383664

Coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (the Stent or Surgery trial): a randomised controlled trial.

.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Results of trials, comparing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), indicate that rates of death or myocardial infarction are similar with either treatment strategy. Management with PTCA is, however, associated with an increased requirement for subsequent, additional revascularisation. Coronary stents, used as an adjunct to PTCA, reduce restenosis and the need for repeat revascularisation. The aim of the Stent or Surgery (SoS) trial was to assess the effect of stent-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus CABG in the management of patients with multivessel disease.
METHODS: In 53 centres in Europe and Canada, symptomatic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease were randomised to CABG (n=500) or stent-assisted PCI (n=488). The primary outcome measure was a comparison of the rates of repeat revascularisation. Secondary outcomes included death or Q-wave myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality. Analysis was by intention to treat.
FINDINGS: All patients were followed-up for a minimum of 1 year and the results are expressed for the median follow-up of 2 years. 21% (n=101) of patients in the PCI group required additional revascularisation procedures compared with 6% (n=30) in the CABG group (hazard ratio 3.85, 95% CI 2.56-5.79, p<0.0001). The incidence of death or Q-wave myocardial infarction was similar in both groups (PCI 9% [n=46], CABG 10% [n=49]; hazard ratio 0.95, 95% CI 0.63-1.42, p=0.80). There were fewer deaths in the CABG group than in the PCI group (PCI 5% [n=22], CABG 2% [n=8]; hazard ratio 2.91, 95% CI 1.29-6.53, p=0.01).
INTERPRETATION: The use of coronary stents has reduced the need for repeat revascularisation when compared with previous studies that used balloon angioplasty, though the rate remains significantly higher than in patients managed with CABG. The apparent reduction in mortality with CABG requires further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12383664     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11078-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  66 in total

Review 1.  New developments in percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Julian Gunn; David Crossman; Ever D Grech; David Cumberland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-07-19

2.  Revascularisation for acute coronary syndromes: PCI or CABG?

Authors:  J Gunn; D P Taggart
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Percutaneous coronary intervention in diabetics.

Authors:  Juhana Karha; Deepak L Bhatt
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 4.  Multi-vessel coronary disease and percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  C Casey; David P Faxon
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  Revascularization for left main and multivessel coronary artery disease in the drug-eluting stent era: integration of recent drug-eluting stent trials.

Authors:  Samip Vasaiwala; David O Williams
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  [Disappearing borders between cardiology and cardiothoracic surgery: status quo].

Authors:  R Bekeredjian; T Schilling; H A Katus; A Haverich
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 7.  Controversies in off-pump coronary artery surgery.

Authors:  John Pepper
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2005-02

Review 8.  Will drug-eluting stents replace coronary artery bypass surgery?

Authors:  Ross M Reul
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2005

9.  Is there any place for oral anti-restenotic treatment in the era of drug eluting stents?

Authors:  A H Gershlick
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 10.  Chronic coronary artery disease: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Andrew Cassar; David R Holmes; Charanjit S Rihal; Bernard J Gersh
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.616

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.