Literature DB >> 12382108

Basilar membrane vibrations near the round window of the gerbil cochlea.

Edward H Overstreet1, Andrei N Temchin, Mario A Ruggero.   

Abstract

Using a laser velocimeter, responses to tones were measured at a basilar membrane site located about 1.2 mm from the extreme basal end of the gerbil cochlea. In two exceptional cochleae in which function was only moderately disrupted by surgical preparations, basilar membrane responses had characteristic frequencies (CFs) of 34-37 kHz and exhibited a CF-specific compressive nonlinearity: Sensitivity near the CF decreased systematically and the response peaks shifted toward lower frequencies with increasing stimulus level. Response phases also changed with increases in stimulus level, exhibiting small relative lags and leads at frequencies just lower and higher than CF, respectively. Basilar membrane responses to low-level CF tones exceeded the magnitude of stapes vibrations by 54-56 dB. Response phases led stapes vibrations by about 90 degrees at low stimulus frequencies; at higher frequencies, basilar membrane responses increasingly lagged stapes vibration, accumulating 1.5 periods of phase lag at CF. Postmortem, nonlinearities were abolished and responses peaked at approximately 0.5 octave below CF, with phases which lagged and led in vivo responses at frequencies lower and higher than CF, respectively. In conclusion, basilar membrane responses near the round window of the gerbil cochlea closely resemble those for other basal cochlear sites in gerbil and other species.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12382108      PMCID: PMC1868570          DOI: 10.1007/s101620020023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  24 in total

1.  High-frequency sensitivity of the mature gerbil cochlea and its development.

Authors:  Edward H Overstreet; Claus-Peter Richter; Andrei N Temchin; Mary Ann Cheatham; Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  The roles of the external, middle, and inner ears in determining the bandwidth of hearing.

Authors:  Mario A Ruggero; Andrei N Temchin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The biophysical origin of traveling-wave dispersion in the cochlea.

Authors:  Sripriya Ramamoorthy; Ding-Jun Zha; Alfred L Nuttall
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Towards a unifying basis of auditory thresholds: the effects of hearing loss on temporal integration reconsidered.

Authors:  Heinrich Neubauer; Peter Heil
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-12

5.  Comparison of group delays of 2f(1)-f(2) distortion product otoacoustic emissions and cochlear travel times.

Authors:  Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  Acoust Res Lett Online       Date:  2004-10

6.  In vivo impedance of the gerbil cochlear partition at auditory frequencies.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Simultaneous Intracochlear Pressure Measurements from Two Cochlear Locations: Propagation of Distortion Products in Gerbil.

Authors:  Wei Dong
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-12-01

Review 8.  Structured Counseling for Auditory Dynamic Range Expansion.

Authors:  Susan L Gold; Craig Formby
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2017-02

Review 9.  The physiology of mechanoelectrical transduction channels in hearing.

Authors:  Robert Fettiplace; Kyunghee X Kim
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 37.312

10.  Reticular lamina and basilar membrane vibrations in living mouse cochleae.

Authors:  Tianying Ren; Wenxuan He; David Kemp
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.