Literature DB >> 12382027

Comparing whole body 18F-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography and technetium-99m methylene diophosphate bone scan to detect bone metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

T C Hsia1, Y Y Shen, R F Yen, C H Kao, S P Changlai.   

Abstract

Despite advances in morphological imaging, some patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are found to have non-resectable disease at surgery or die of recurrence within a year of surgery. At present, metastatic bone involvement is usually assessed using conventional technetium-99m methylene diophosphate (Tc-99m MDP) whole body bone scan (bone scan), which has a high sensitivity but a poor specificity. We have attempted to evaluate the usefulness of whole body positron emission tomography with 18F-2-deoxyglucose (FDG-PET) for the detection of malignant bone metastases of NSCLC, and to compare FDG-PET results with Bone Scan findings. Forty-eight patients with biopsy-proven NSCLC and suspected to have stage IV disease underwent whole body bone scan and FDG-PET to detect bone metastases. The final diagnoses of bone metastases were established by operative, histopathological findings or clinical follow-up longer than 1 year by additional radiographs or following FDG-PET/Tc-99m MDP bone scan findings showing progressively and extensively widespread bone lesions. A total of 138 bone lesions found on either FDG-PET or Tc-99m MDP bone scan were evaluated. Among the 106 metastatic and 32 benign bone lesions, FDG-PET and Tc-99m MDP bone scan could accurately diagnose 99 and 98, as well as 30 and 2 metastatic and benign bone lesions, respectively. Diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy of FDG-PET and Tc-99m MDP bone scan were 93.4% and 92.5%, as well as 93.5% and 72.5%, respectively. In conclusion, our data suggest that FDG-PET with the same sensitivity and a better accuracy than those of Tc-99m MDP bone scan to detect metastatic bone lesions in patients with biopsy-proven NSCLC and suspected to have stage IV disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12382027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neoplasma        ISSN: 0028-2685            Impact factor:   2.575


  7 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of bone metastases: a meta-analysis comparing ¹⁸FDG PET, CT, MRI and bone scintigraphy.

Authors:  Hui-Lin Yang; Tao Liu; Xi-Ming Wang; Yong Xu; Sheng-Ming Deng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Positron emission tomography/computerized tomography in lung cancer.

Authors:  Ilgin Sahiner; Gulin Ucmak Vural
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2014-06

3.  Rapid normalization of osseous FDG uptake following traumatic or surgical fractures.

Authors:  Hongming Zhuang; Joseph W Sam; Thomas K Chacko; Paulo S Duarte; Marc Hickeson; Qi Feng; Kozaim Z Nakhoda; Liang Guan; Phillip Reich; Shirley M Altimari; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-05-22       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Improved detection of skull metastasis with diffusion-weighted MR imaging.

Authors:  A J Nemeth; J W Henson; M E Mullins; R G Gonzalez; P W Schaefer
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Appropriateness of imaging for lung cancer staging in a national cohort.

Authors:  Leah M Backhus; Farhood Farjah; Thomas K Varghese; Aaron M Cheng; Xiao-Hua Zhou; Douglas E Wood; Larry Kessler; Steven B Zeliadt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Role of FDG-PET scans in staging, response assessment, and follow-up care for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  John Cuaron; Mark Dunphy; Andreas Rimner
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 7.  Positron emission tomography scanning for the diagnosis and management of lung cancer.

Authors:  Bruce R Line; Charles S White
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2004-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.