Literature DB >> 11508441

Ankylosing spondylitis assessment group preliminary definition of short-term improvement in ankylosing spondylitis.

J J Anderson1, G Baron, D van der Heijde, D T Felson, M Dougados.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop criteria for symptomatic improvement in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), using outcome domain data from placebo-controlled clinical trials of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).
METHODS: Patient data from 5 short-term, randomized, controlled trials were used to assess equivalence, reliability, and responsiveness of multiple items in the 5 outcome domains for AS treatment: physical function, pain, spinal mobility, patient global assessment, and inflammation. At least one measure per domain was responsive (standardized response mean of > 0.5), except for the spinal mobility domain, which was omitted from the criteria. We developed and tested candidate improvement criteria in a random two-thirds subset from the 3 largest trials and used the remaining one-third for validation. These 3 largest trials included 923 patients (631 receiving NSAIDs, 292 in placebo groups). We selected the multiple domain definition that best distinguished NSAID treatment from placebo by chi-square test and that had a placebo response rate of < or = 25%.
RESULTS: Candidate definitions were changes in single domains and in multiple measure indices, as well as combinations of improvements in multiple domains. Worsening in a domain was defined as a change for the worse of > or = 20% and a net change for the worse of > or = 10 units on a scale of 0-100. Partial remission (for comparison purposes) was defined as an end-of-trial value of < 20/100 in each of the 4 domains. Among 20 candidate criteria, change of > or = 20% and > or = 10 units in each of 3 domains and absence of worsening in the fourth discriminated best in the development subset (51% of patients improved with NSAIDs, 25% with placebo; chi2 = 36.4, P < 0.001). Results were confirmed in the validation subset. Almost all patients satisfying the definition of partial disease remission at the end of the trial had also improved by this criterion. Among all 923 patients, improvement rates using this criterion were 49% for NSAID-treated patients and 24% for placebo-treated patients.
CONCLUSION: Although further validation using data from new trials is still needed, we conclude that we have developed a clinically valid, easy-to-use measure of short-term improvement in AS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11508441     DOI: 10.1002/1529-0131(200108)44:8<1876::AID-ART326>3.0.CO;2-F

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  149 in total

Review 1.  Conventional treatments for ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  M Dougados; B Dijkmans; M Khan; W Maksymowych; Sj van der Linden; J Brandt
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 2.  International ASAS consensus statement for the use of anti-tumour necrosis factor agents in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  J Braun; T Pham; J Sieper; J Davis; Sj van der Linden; M Dougados; D van der Heijde
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 3.  Secukinumab: a promising therapeutic option in spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Hernan Maldonado-Ficco; Rodolfo Perez-Alamino; José A Maldonado-Cocco
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  [Recommendations for the management of ankylosing spodylitis after ASAS/EULAR. Evaluation in the German language area].

Authors:  J Braun; J Zochling; E Märker-Hermann; G Stucki; H Böhm; M Rudwaleit; H Zeidler; J Sieper
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 5.  Cost effectiveness of therapeutic interventions in ankylosing spondylitis: a critical and systematic review.

Authors:  Cécile Gaujoux-Viala; Bruno Fautrel
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Spontaneous, drug-induced, and drug-free remission in peripheral and axial spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Denis Poddubnyy; Lianne S Gensler
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 4.098

7.  A novel gene variation of TNFalpha associated with ankylosing spondylitis: a reconfirmed study.

Authors:  Xiaoquan Zhu; Yawen Wang; Liang Sun; Yuguo Song; Fei Sun; Lei Tang; Zhenghao Huo; Jianxin Li; Ze Yang
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Two year maintenance of efficacy and safety of infliximab in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  J Braun; J Brandt; J Listing; A Zink; R Alten; G Burmester; E Gromnica-Ihle; H Kellner; M Schneider; H Sörensen; H Zeidler; J Sieper
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 9.  [Ankylosing spondylitis. Target treatment criteria].

Authors:  J Braun; J Sieper
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.372

10.  Identification of acute phase reactants and cytokines useful for monitoring infliximab therapy in ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  Consuelo Romero-Sánchez; William H Robinson; Beren H Tomooka; John Londoño; Rafael Valle-Oñate; Feng Huang; Xiaohu Deng; Liyun Zhang; Chunhua Yang; David Tak Yan Yu
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.