Literature DB >> 12380726

Microbiology of chronic suppurative otitis media in Singapore.

A H C Loy1, A L Tan, P K S Lu.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to study the microflora and the antibiograms of patients with chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) in Singapore. Ninety patients with CSOM were prospectively studied. They had chronic ear discharge and had not received antibiotics for the previous five days. Swabs were taken, and cultured for bacteria. Antibiotic testing was done using modified Kirby Bauer disk diffusion method. In addition to the usual antibiotics, the three most common topically available antibiotics (chloramphenicol, gentamicin and neomycin) were tested. There were 135 positive cultures for organisms from the 90 patients. The most common causal organisms isolated were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (33.3%) and Staphylococcus aureus (33.3%) followed by coagulase negative Staphylococcus (21.1%). Fungi accounted for 8.8% of isolates while 6.6% were anaerobes. Of the three antibiotics commonly available as topical eardrops, gentamicin has the highest susceptibility rate (82.6%), followed by neomycin (67.8%) and chloramphenicol (62.8%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12380726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Singapore Med J        ISSN: 0037-5675            Impact factor:   1.858


  13 in total

1.  Chronic suppurative otitis media: optimizing initial antibiotic therapy in a tertiary care setup.

Authors:  Shashidhar Vishwanath; Chiranjay Mukhopadhyay; Rajat Prakash; Suresh Pillai; Kailesh Pujary; Parul Pujary
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-09-13

2.  Comparison of bacteriology in bilaterally discharging ears in chronic suppurative otitis media.

Authors:  Karan Sharma; Aruna Aggarwal; Preet Mohan S Khurana
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-09-24

3.  Topical vs Combination Ciprofloxacin in the Management of Discharging Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media.

Authors:  G S Renukananda; Santosh U P; Nitha Mary George
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-06-20

4.  Bacteriological Profile and Antibiotic Sensitivity Pattern in Tubotympanic Variety of CSOM in Northern Part of West Bengal.

Authors:  Chiranjib Das; Ranadeep Ghosh; Tanushree Mondal
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-01-08

5.  Microbiology of chronic suppurative otitis media at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, Blantyre, Malawi: A cross-sectional descriptive study.

Authors:  M Chirwa; W Mulwafu; J M Aswani; P W Masinde; R Mkakosya; D Soko
Journal:  Malawi Med J       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.875

6.  Bacteriological Profile and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern in Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media: A 1-Year Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Basavaraj Hiremath; R S Mudhol; Manjula A Vagrali
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-02-21

7.  Microbiology of chronic suppurative otitis media in a tertiary care setup of uttarakhand state, India.

Authors:  Rajat Prakash; Deepak Juyal; Vikrant Negi; Shekhar Pal; Shamanth Adekhandi; Munesh Sharma; Neelam Sharma
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2013-04

8.  Bacterial profile and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of otitis media in Ayder Teaching and Referral Hospital, Mekelle University, Northern Ethiopia.

Authors:  Araya Gebereyesus Wasihun; Yilikal Zemene
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-11-14

9.  Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of clinical isolates from cases of ear infection using amoxicillin and cefepime.

Authors:  Shaheen Perveen; Syed Baqir Naqvi; Anab Fatima
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-07-01

10.  Predictors of disease complications and treatment outcome among patients with chronic suppurative otitis media attending a tertiary hospital, Mwanza Tanzania.

Authors:  Martha F Mushi; Alfred E Mwalutende; Japhet M Gilyoma; Phillipo L Chalya; Jeremiah Seni; Mariam M Mirambo; Stephen E Mshana
Journal:  BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord       Date:  2016-01-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.