Literature DB >> 12379606

Frontal brain activity predicts individual performance in an associative memory exclusion test.

Cyma Van Petten1, Barbara J Luka, Susan R Rubin, John P Ryan.   

Abstract

Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded from 24 young adults during a recognition test including Old, New, and Recombined pairs composed of two words studied in different pairs. Recombined pairs called for a response of 'new'. Task difficulty was increased by repetition of some words during the study phase; a subject might study tower/pie, puppet/pie, drill/wreath and bee/wreath (pairs with a Common word), and at test, encounter the Common Recombined pair of puppet/wreath (in addition to Unique Recombined pairs composed of two words studied once). Individual accuracy in the Recombined conditions varied widely, but was unrelated to general memory ability as indexed by accuracy on the Old and New pairs. Posterior brain potentials showed graded amplitudes dependent on the oldness of both the individual words and their combinations (Old > Recombined > New, and Common > Unique), but were also unrelated to accuracy in the Recombined conditions. Amplitudes of ERPs recorded over prefrontal scalp accounted for a large proportion of the individual variability in differentiating studied combinations of words from recombinations of studied elements. The experimental design differentiates three possible roles of prefrontal cortex in source or associative memory tests: resolving a conflict between familiarity and a response of 'new', extended memory search, and evaluation of ambiguous memory signals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12379606     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/12.11.1180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  10 in total

1.  The effects of age on the neural correlates of successful episodic retrieval: an ERP study.

Authors:  Juan Li; Alexa M Morcom; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Prefrontal engagement during source memory retrieval depends on the prior encoding task.

Authors:  Trudy Y Kuo; Cyma Van Petten
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Color and context: an ERP study on intrinsic and extrinsic feature binding in episodic memory.

Authors:  Ullrich K H Ecker; Hubert D Zimmer; Christian Groh-Bordin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-09

4.  Perceptual difficulty in source memory encoding and retrieval: prefrontal versus parietal electrical brain activity.

Authors:  Trudy Y Kuo; Cyma Van Petten
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 5.  Source monitoring 15 years later: what have we learned from fMRI about the neural mechanisms of source memory?

Authors:  Karen J Mitchell; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Enactment versus conceptual encoding: equivalent item memory but different source memory.

Authors:  Ava J Senkfor; Cyma Van Petten; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Effects of aging, distraction, and response pressure on the binding of actors and actions.

Authors:  Alan W Kersten; Julie L Earles
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2010-09

8.  After the P3: late executive processes in stimulus categorization.

Authors:  Jonathan R Folstein; Cyma van Petten
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Effects of age on the neural correlates of retrieval cue processing are modulated by task demands.

Authors:  Sandrine Duverne; Shahab Motamedinia; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Investigating the Functional Utility of the Left Parietal ERP Old/New Effect: Brain Activity Predicts within But Not between Participant Variance in Episodic Recollection.

Authors:  Catherine A MacLeod; David I Donaldson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.