Literature DB >> 20946130

After the P3: late executive processes in stimulus categorization.

Jonathan R Folstein1, Cyma van Petten.   

Abstract

Two experiments examined the hypothesis that dual systems of stimulus evaluation for categorization can be observed in event-related potentials: one whose duration is indexed by the latency of the P3 component, and a second evident in a later frontal potential. Subjects categorized artificial animals by a "two out of three" rule. Stimuli with two visual features of their own category and one feature of a different category (i.e., near the boundary between categories) elicited very prolonged reaction times as compared to stimuli with three features from a single category. This response time (RT) delay was not accompanied by a delayed P3, suggesting that the P3 indexed only a first pass of stimulus evaluation. The near-boundary stimuli elicited more positive potentials than far-boundary stimuli at prefrontal and frontotemporal sites, suggesting that a secondary stage of stimulus evaluation was triggered when detection of single features or simple conjunctions was insufficient to support a correct decision. The frontal potential that was sensitive to categorization difficulty was of opposite polarity to frontal potentials previously observed in manipulations of working memory. The roles of frontal executive processes in categorization and memory tasks are discussed.
Copyright © 2010 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20946130      PMCID: PMC3026872          DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01146.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  67 in total

1.  P300 and response time from a manual Stroop task.

Authors:  A B Ilan; J Polich
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Memory for drawings in locations: spatial source memory and event-related potentials.

Authors:  C Van Petten; A J Senkfor; W M Newberg
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  PET evidence for multiple strategies of categorization.

Authors:  A L Patalano; E E Smith; J Jonides; R A Koeppe
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Novelty and conflict in the categorization of complex stimuli.

Authors:  Jonathan R Folstein; Cyma Van Petten; Scott A Rose
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Cortical areas supporting category learning identified using functional MRI.

Authors:  P J Reber; C E Stark; L R Squire
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-01-20       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  ERPs to response production and inhibition.

Authors:  A Pfefferbaum; J M Ford; B J Weller; B S Kopell
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-05

7.  Attention to color: an analysis of selection, controlled search, and motor activation, using event-related potentials.

Authors:  A A Wijers; G Mulder; T Okita; L J Mulder; M K Scheffers
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Second thoughts: multiple P300s elicited by a single stimulus.

Authors:  R Johnson; E Donchin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Presidential address, 1980. Surprise!...Surprise?

Authors:  E Donchin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning.

Authors:  F G Ashby; L A Alfonso-Reese; A U Turken; E M Waldron
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  12 in total

1.  Thinking ahead or not? Natural aging and anticipation during reading.

Authors:  Katherine A DeLong; David M Groppe; Thomas P Urbach; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Brain signatures of perceiving a smile: Time course and source localization.

Authors:  David Beltrán; Manuel G Calvo
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Cognitive changes in conjunctive rule-based category learning: An ERP approach.

Authors:  Rahel Rabi; Marc F Joanisse; Tianshu Zhu; John Paul Minda
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Posttraumatic stress disorder is associated with limited executive resources in a working memory task.

Authors:  Nikki Honzel; Timothy Justus; Diane Swick
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Age-related changes in brain activity are specific for high order cognitive processes during successful encoding of information in working memory.

Authors:  Diego Pinal; Montserrat Zurrón; Fernando Díaz
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 5.750

6.  Ignore Similarity If You Can: A Computational Exploration of Exemplar Similarity Effects on Rule Application.

Authors:  Duncan P Brumby; Ulrike Hahn
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-03-21

7.  Probing the relationship between late endogenous ERP components with fluid intelligence in healthy older adults.

Authors:  Ana C Teixeira-Santos; Diego Pinal; Diana R Pereira; Jorge Leite; Sandra Carvalho; Adriana Sampaio
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Tracking the implicit acquisition of nonadjacent transitional probabilities by ERPs.

Authors:  Andrea Kóbor; Kata Horváth; Zsófia Kardos; Ádám Takács; Karolina Janacsek; Valéria Csépe; Dezso Nemeth
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-11

9.  Indirect assessment of an interpretation bias in humans: neurophysiological and behavioral correlates.

Authors:  Anita Schick; Michèle Wessa; Barbara Vollmayr; Christine Kuehner; Philipp Kanske
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Effects of load and maintenance duration on the time course of information encoding and retrieval in working memory: from perceptual analysis to post-categorization processes.

Authors:  Diego Pinal; Montserrat Zurrón; Fernando Díaz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.