Literature DB >> 12379467

Bystander effect for chromosomal aberrations induced in wild-type and repair deficient CHO cells by low fluences of alpha particles.

Hatsumi Nagasawa1, John B Little.   

Abstract

We have previously shown that when confluent cultures of mammalian cells are exposed to very low fluences of alpha particles, fluences whereby as few as 1% of the cell nuclei are traversed by a single particle, genetic effects including specific gene mutations and sister chromatid exchanges (SCE) are induced in neighboring, non-irradiated "bystander" cells. The present investigation was designed to examine the induction of chromosomal aberrations in wild-type CHO cells and its DNA double strand break repair deficient mutant xrs-5 by a broad range of alpha particle fluences yielding mean doses of 0.17-200cGy. The dose-response curve for the induction of aberrations was curvilinear for both cell lines, with a greater effect occurring at very low fluences owing to aberrations arising in bystander cells. These aberrations were predominantly of the chromatid-type. With such fluences, the number of cells with induced aberrations per nucleus irradiated increased up to 4-fold in CHO cells and 15-fold in xrs-5 cells over that expected if aberrations occurred only in irradiated cells. These results are discussed in terms of the hypothesis that the primary DNA damage in bystander CHO cells is oxidative base damage leading to a relatively small bystander effect for gross chromosomal aberrations as compared with mutations or SCE; the larger bystander effect in xrs-5 cells is the result of oxidative damage and non-repaired DNA strand breaks which may result from opposed oxidative lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12379467     DOI: 10.1016/s0027-5107(02)00193-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  26 in total

Review 1.  Double-strand breaks and the concept of short- and long-term epigenetic memory.

Authors:  Christian Orlowski; Li-Jeen Mah; Raja S Vasireddy; Assam El-Osta; Tom C Karagiannis
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Protective bystander effects simulated with the state-vector model.

Authors:  Helmut Schöllnberger; Peter M Eckl
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  The role of nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination in the clonogenic bystander effects of mammalian cells after exposure to counted 10 MeV protons and 4.5 MeV alpha-particles of the PTB microbeam.

Authors:  Dieter Frankenberg; Klaus-D Greif; Wolfgang Beverung; Frank Langner; Ulrich Giesen
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  The bystander effect: recent developments and implications for understanding the dose response.

Authors:  R E J Mitchel
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2004-07

5.  Human lung cancer risks from radon - part I - influence from bystander effects - a microdose analysis.

Authors:  Bobby E Leonard; Richard E Thompson; Georgia C Beecher
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Differential role of DNA-PKcs phosphorylations and kinase activity in radiosensitivity and chromosomal instability.

Authors:  Hatsumi Nagasawa; John B Little; Yu-Fen Lin; Sairei So; Akihiro Kurimasa; Yuanlin Peng; John R Brogan; David J Chen; Joel S Bedford; Benjamin P C Chen
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 7.  New molecular targets in radiotherapy: DNA damage signalling and repair in targeted and non-targeted cells.

Authors:  Susanne Burdak-Rothkamm; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 4.432

8.  Emerging role of radiation induced bystander effects: Cell communications and carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Rajamanickam Baskar
Journal:  Genome Integr       Date:  2010-09-12

9.  Ionizing radiation-induced bystander mutagenesis and adaptation: quantitative and temporal aspects.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Junqing Zhou; Joseph Baldwin; Kathryn D Held; Kevin M Prise; Robert W Redmond; Howard L Liber
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  Intercellular communication of cellular stress monitored by gamma-H2AX induction.

Authors:  Jennifer S Dickey; Brandon J Baird; Christophe E Redon; Mykyta V Sokolov; Olga A Sedelnikova; William M Bonner
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 4.944

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.