Literature DB >> 12378952

Effect of lead and arsenic on murine macrophage response.

Mahuya Sengupta1, Biswadev Bishayi.   

Abstract

Splenic macrophages are highly efficient in trapping and concentrating foreign substances carried in the blood and also the major sites where antibodies are synthesised and from where they are released into the circulation. Lead and Arsenic as environmental agents are considered to be high priority toxic substances largely due to their carcinogenic potentials in humans. However, these heavy metals as carcinogens remain an enigma because while they are definitely active in humans, carcinogenesis in the rodent model has never been convincingly demonstrated. Although macrophages are predominantly recruited to the site of inflammation during inflammatory distress as well as in immune response, nothing is known about the interaction of lead and arsenic with macrophages and their possible role in immunotoxicologic effect. In the present study it is reported that in vivo lead acetate treatment (10 mg/kg body wt) inhibits the cell adhesion property and alters the cell morphology in the splenic macrophages. Results show that there is a significant decrease in alkaline phosphatase release in lead treated macrophages (6.7 +/- 0.88 IU/100 mL) with respect to control (14.17 +/- 0.18). In vivo exposure of sodium arsenite (0.5 mg/kg body wt) also decreases phagocytic activity for ingestion and digestion of exogenous antigens, such as whole microorganism, as evident from the phagocytic index, 11555.55 +/- 62.86 (in control) to 5555.5 +/- 1571.33 in arsenic treated cells. Arsenic exposed cells release 8.15 +/- 0.05 microM nitric oxide, whereas control cells release 10.95 +/- 0.15 microM of nitric oxide, which is also identical following LPS stimulation. Results show that the functional integrity of the target cell is also decreased after arsenic exposure as obtained from the percentage of DNA fragmentation. A greater percentage of DNA fragmentation upon arsenic treatment (43.1 +/- 0.05%) with respect to control (14.9 +/- 0.34%) indicates that arsenic induces apoptosis. In immune cells which are rapidly proliferating and differentiating, inhibition of these heavy metal induced functions may result in similar degree of toxicity and lead to diseased state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12378952     DOI: 10.1081/dct-120014796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Chem Toxicol        ISSN: 0148-0545            Impact factor:   3.356


  20 in total

1.  Sodium arsenite mediated immuno-disruption through alteration of transcription profile of cytokines in chicken splenocytes under in vitro system.

Authors:  Subhashree Das; Diganta Pan; Asit Kumar Bera; Tanmoy Rana; Debasis Bhattacharya; Subhasis Bandyapadyay; Sumanta De; V Sreevatsava; Somnath Bhattacharya; Subrata Kumar Das; Sandip Bandyopadhayay
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Arsenic trioxide ameliorates murine colon inflammation through inflammatory cell enzymatic modulation.

Authors:  Hichem Moulahoum; Belkacem Mohamed Amine Boumaza; Meriem Ferrat; Abdelkader Bounaama; Bahia Djerdjouri
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 3.  Old dog, new trick: Trivalent arsenic as an immunomodulatory drug.

Authors:  Yishan Ye; Béatrice Gaugler; Mohamad Mohty; Florent Malard
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  Effects of arsenic on zebrafish innate immune system.

Authors:  Andrea C Hermann; Carol H Kim
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 3.619

5.  Early life environment and developmental immunotoxicity in inflammatory dysfunction and disease.

Authors:  Cynthia A Leifer; Rodney R Dietert
Journal:  Toxicol Environ Chem       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 6.  The effect of environmental chemicals on the tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Stephanie C Casey; Monica Vaccari; Fahd Al-Mulla; Rabeah Al-Temaimi; Amedeo Amedei; Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff; Dustin G Brown; Marion Chapellier; Joseph Christopher; Colleen S Curran; Stefano Forte; Roslida A Hamid; Petr Heneberg; Daniel C Koch; P K Krishnakumar; Ezio Laconi; Veronique Maguer-Satta; Fabio Marongiu; Lorenzo Memeo; Chiara Mondello; Jayadev Raju; Jesse Roman; Rabindra Roy; Elizabeth P Ryan; Sandra Ryeom; Hosni K Salem; A Ivana Scovassi; Neetu Singh; Laura Soucek; Louis Vermeulen; Jonathan R Whitfield; Jordan Woodrick; Annamaria Colacci; William H Bisson; Dean W Felsher
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.944

7.  Low-level arsenic causes chronic inflammation and suppresses expression of phagocytic receptors.

Authors:  Priyanka Prasad; Dona Sinha
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Chronic arsenic exposure impairs macrophage functions in the exposed individuals.

Authors:  Nilanjana Banerjee; Saptarshi Banerjee; Rupashree Sen; Apurba Bandyopadhyay; Nilendu Sarma; Papiya Majumder; Jayanta K Das; Mitali Chatterjee; Syed N Kabir; Ashok K Giri
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 8.317

9.  Lead-induced cytotoxicity and transcriptional activation of stress genes in human liver carcinoma (HepG2) cells.

Authors:  Paul B Tchounwou; Clement G Yedjou; Dominique N Foxx; Ali B Ishaque; Elaine Shen
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.396

10.  Basic apoptotic mechanisms of lead toxicity in human leukemia (HL-60) cells.

Authors:  Clement G Yedjou; Jessica N Milner; Carolyn B Howard; Paul B Tchounwou
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.