Literature DB >> 12377330

Operable Stages IB and II cervical carcinomas: a retrospective study comparing preoperative uterovaginal brachytherapy and postoperative radiotherapy.

Dan Atlan1, Emmanuel Touboul, Elisabeth Deniaud-Alexandre, Jean-Pierre Lefranc, Jean-Marie Antoine, Denis Jannet, Pierre Lhuillier, Michèle Uzan, Judith Huart, Catherine Genestie, Martine Antoine, Myriam Jamali, Valérie Ganansia, Jacques Milliez, Serge Uzan, Jean Blondon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate our data concerning prognostic factors and treatment toxicity in a series of operable cervical carcinomas. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between May 1972 and January 1994, 414 patients with cervical carcinoma, staged according to the 1995 FIGO staging system (286 Stage IB1, 38 Stage IB2, 56 Stage IIA, and 34 Stage IIB with 1/3 proximal parametrial involvement), underwent radical hysterectomy with (n = 380) or without (n = 34) bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection (N+: n = 68). Group I included 168 patients who received postoperative radiation therapy (RT): 64 patients had low-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy with a median total dose (MTD) of 50 Gy; 93 patients had external beam pelvic RT (EBPRT) with an MTD of 45 Gy over 5 weeks, followed by low-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy (MTD: 20 Gy); and 11 patients had EBPRT alone (MTD: 50 Gy over 6 weeks). Group II included 246 patients treated with preoperative low-dose-rate uterovaginal brachytherapy (MTD: 65 Gy); 32 of these 246 patients also received postoperative EBPRT (MTD: 45 Gy over 5 weeks) delivered to the parametria and pelvic nodes. Mean follow-up from the beginning of treatment was 106 months.
RESULTS: First events included isolated locoregional recurrences (35 patients), isolated distant metastases (27 patients), and locoregional recurrences with synchronous metastases (13 patients). The 10-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 88% for Stage IB1, 44% for Stage IB2, 65% for Stage IIA, and 48% for Stage IIB. Multivariate analysis showed that independent factors influencing the probability of DFS were as follows: cervical site (exocervical or endocervical vs. both endo- and exocervical, relative risk [RR]: 1.77, p = 0.047), vascular space invasion (no vs. yes, RR: 1.95, p = 0.041), age (>51 years vs. <or=51 years, RR: 1.90, p = 0.013), 1995 FIGO staging system (IB1 vs. IIA, RR: 2.95, p = 0.004; IB1 vs. IB2, RR: 3.49, p = 0.0009; and IB1 vs. IIB, RR: 4.54, p = 0.00002), and histologic pelvic lymph node involvement (N- vs. N+, RR: 2.94, p = 0.00009). The sequence of adjuvant RT did not influence the probability of DFS (Group I vs. Group II, p = 0.10). In Group II, after univariate analysis, DFS was significantly influenced by histologic residual cervical tumor in the hysterectomy specimen (yes vs. no: 71% vs. 93%, respectively, p < 10(-6)) and by the size of the residual tumor (<or=1 cm vs. >1 cm: 83% vs. 41%, respectively, p = 0.001). The overall postoperative complication rate was 10% in Group I and 9% in Group II (p = 0.7). The rate of postoperative ureteral complications requiring surgical intervention was lower in Group I than in Group II (0.6% vs. 2.3%, respectively, p = 0.03). The overall 10-year rate for Grade 3 and 4 late radiation complications was 10.4%. Postoperative EBPRT significantly increased the 10-year rate for Grade 3 and 4 late radiation complications (yes vs. no: 22% vs. 7%, respectively, p = 0.0002).
CONCLUSION: The prognosis for patients with cervical carcinoma was not influenced by the sequence of adjuvant RT (preoperative uterovaginal brachytherapy vs. postoperative RT) for Stages IB, IIA, and IIB with 1/3 proximal parametrial involvement. However, postoperative EBPRT increased the risk of late radiation complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12377330     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02971-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  10 in total

Review 1.  The impact of radiation on lymphedema: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Omar Allam; Kitae E Park; Ludmila Chandler; Mohammad Ali Mozaffari; Maham Ahmad; Xiaona Lu; Michael Alperovich
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-04

Review 2.  Current Standards in the Management of Early and Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Update on the Benefit of Neoadjuvant/Adjuvant Strategies.

Authors:  Yuedan Zhou; Elie Rassy; Alexandre Coutte; Samir Achkar; Sophie Espenel; Catherine Genestie; Patricia Pautier; Philippe Morice; Sébastien Gouy; Cyrus Chargari
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Pathologic complete remission after preoperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy in patients with operable cervical cancer: preliminary results of a prospective randomized multicenter study.

Authors:  Julia Vízkeleti; Ildikó Vereczkey; Georgina Fröhlich; Szilvia Varga; Katalin Horváth; Tamás Pulay; Imre Pete; Csaba Nemeskéri; Árpád Mayer; Norbert Sipos; Miklós Kásler; Csaba Polgár
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 4.  Type II or type III radical hysterectomy compared to chemoradiotherapy as a primary intervention for stage IB2 cervical cancer.

Authors:  Vivek Nama; Georgios Angelopoulos; Jeremy Twigg; John B Murdoch; Jo Bailey; Theresa A Lawrie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-12

5.  Preoperative external beam radiotherapy and reduced dose brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix: survival and pathological response.

Authors:  Alexandre A Jacinto; Marcus S Castilho; Paulo E R S Novaes; Pablo R Novick; Gustavo A Viani; João V Salvajoli; Robson Ferrigno; Antonio Cássio A Pellizzon; Stella S S Lima; Maria A C Maia; Ricardo C Fogaroli
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Tolerance and efficacy of preoperative intracavitary HDR brachytherapy in IB and IIA cervical cancer.

Authors:  Brygida Bialas; Sylwia Kellas-Sleczka; Marek Fijalkowski; Katarzyna Raczek-Zwierzycka
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2009-03-23

7.  Comparison of chemoradiotherapy with and without brachytherapy as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in early-stage cervical cancer with poor prognostic factors: An observational study.

Authors:  Mei-Ling Lan; Xian Yu; He Xiao; Peng Zhou; Nan Hu; Yun Liu; Ge Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Lower Extremity Lymphedema in Gynecologic Cancer Patients: Propensity Score Matching Analysis of External Beam Radiation versus Brachytherapy.

Authors:  Won Ick Chang; Hyun-Cheol Kang; Hong-Gyun Wu; Hak Jae Kim; Seung Hyuck Jeon; Maria Lee; Hee Seung Kim; Hyun Hoon Chung; Jae Weon Kim; Noh Hyun Park; Yong Sang Song; Kwan-Sik Seo
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Pre-operative high-dose-rate brachytherapy in early-stage cervical cancer: long-term single-center results.

Authors:  Sylwia Kellas-Ślęczka; Piotr Wojcieszek; Marta Szlag; Magdalena Stankiewicz; Agnieszka Cholewka; Maciej Ślęczka; Agnieszka Badora-Rybicka; Piotr Lelek; Agnieszka Pruefer; Tomasz Krzysztofiak; Zofia Kołosza; Marek Fijałkowski
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2022-01-19

10.  Biological effective dose evaluation and assessment of rectal and bladder complications for cervical cancer treated with radiotherapy and surgery.

Authors:  Catharina Beskow; Anna-Karin Agren-Cronqvist; Rolf Lewensohn; Iuliana Toma-Dasu
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2012-12-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.