Literature DB >> 12377318

Prostate biopsy status and PSA nadir level as early surrogates for treatment failure: analysis of a prostate cancer randomized radiation dose escalation trial.

Alan Pollack1, Gunar K Zagars, John A Antolak, Deborah A Kuban, Isaac I Rosen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A positive biopsy after external beam radiotherapy in patients free of any evidence of treatment failure is not synonymous with eventual recurrence. Although biopsy positivity is a predictor of outcome, the utility of biopsy status as a surrogate end point, the effect of radiation dose on biopsy status, and the interrelationships of these associations to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir level are not well-defined. These issues were investigated in a cohort of men with Stage T1-T3 prostate cancer who were randomized to receive between 70 Gy and 78 Gy and were prospectively biopsied at about 2 years after the completion of radiotherapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Of the 301 assessable patients in the trial, 168 underwent planned sextant or greater prostate post-RT biopsies in the absence of biochemical or clinical failure; this group constituted the study cohort. Of the 168 patients, 87 were in the 70-Gy arm and 81 in the 78-Gy arm. Biopsies were classified into four groups: negative (no tumor), atypical/suspicious cells (not diagnostic of carcinoma), carcinoma with treatment effect (CaTxEffect), and carcinoma without treatment effect (CaNoTxEffect). Any diagnosis of carcinoma in the specimen was classified as biopsy positive. Freedom from failure (FFF) included biochemical failure and/or clinical failure. Kaplan-Meier curves were calculated from the completion of RT. For those alive in the study cohort, the median follow-up was 65 months.
RESULTS: The rate of biopsy without tumor was 42%; with atypical cells, it was 28%, with CaTxEffect 21%, and with CaNoTxEffect 9%. The overall biopsy positivity rate (CaTxEffect + CaNoTxEffect) was 30%; 28% in the 70-Gy group and 32% in the 78-Gy group (p = 0.52). The distribution of PSA nadir levels was 73% <or=0.5, 20% >0.5-1.0, 5% >1.0-2.0, and 1% >2.0 ng/mL. Significantly more patients randomized to 78 Gy had a PSA nadir of <or=0.5 ng/mL (80% vs. 67%; p = 0.02). No relationship was found between PSA nadir level and prostate biopsy status. The 5-year FFF rate for those classified as biopsy negative was 84% and for those biopsy positive was 60% (p = 0.0002). Radiation dose did not significantly alter FFF rates by prostate biopsy status. Nadir PSA level correlated with FFF, although this was dependent on the inclusion of the 2 patients with a PSA nadir >2.0 ng/mL.
CONCLUSION: For patients free of treatment failure at the time of prostate biopsy 2 years after RT, the prognosis of no tumor cells was the same as that of atypical/suspicious cells and CaTxEffect was the same as CaNoTxEffect. The biopsy positivity rate was not altered by dose, suggesting that most of the outcome differences between the 70-Gy and 78-Gy groups were due to events occurring before prostate biopsy at 2 years and/or were not entirely dependent on biopsy status. Biopsy status is a strong prognostic factor, but, as an early end point, it may be misleading. PSA nadir appears to have little clinical value in patients treated to doses of >/=70 Gy who are failure free 2 years after RT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12377318     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02977-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  36 in total

Review 1.  Radiation therapy dose escalation for prostate cancer: a rationale for IMRT.

Authors:  Alan Pollack; Alex Hanlon; Eric M Horwitz; Steven Feigenberg; Robert G Uzzo; Robert A Price
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Long-Term Implications of a Positive Posttreatment Biopsy in Patients Treated with External Beam Radiotherapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Michael J Zelefsky; Debra A Goldman; Victor Reuter; Marisa Kollmeier; Sean McBride; Zhigang Zhang; Melissa Varghese; Xin Pei; Zvi Fuks
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  MR-guided pulsed high intensity focused ultrasound enhancement of docetaxel combined with radiotherapy for prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Zhaomei Mu; C-M Ma; Xiaoming Chen; Dusica Cvetkovic; Alan Pollack; Lili Chen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Antisense Bcl-2 sensitizes prostate cancer cells to radiation.

Authors:  Zhaomei Mu; Paul Hachem; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 4.104

5.  Radiation dose and late failures in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Peter B Morgan; Alexandra L Hanlon; Eric M Horwitz; Mark K Buyyounouski; Robert G Uzzo; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Radiotherapy doses of 80 Gy and higher are associated with lower mortality in men with Gleason score 8 to 10 prostate cancer.

Authors:  Niraj Pahlajani; Karen J Ruth; Mark K Buyyounouski; David Y T Chen; Eric M Horwitz; Gerald E Hanks; Robert A Price; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Influence of local tumor control on distant metastases and cancer related mortality after external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael J Zelefsky; Victor E Reuter; Zvi Fuks; Peter Scardino; Alison Shippy
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Residual prostate cancer after radiotherapy: a study of radical cystoprostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  David J Kaplan; Paul L Crispen; Richard E Greenberg; David Y T Chen; Rosalia Viterbo; Mark K Buyyounouski; Eric M Horwitz; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  T2-Weighted endorectal magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer after external beam radiation therapy.

Authors:  Antonio C Westphalen; John Kurhanewicz; Rui M G Cunha; I-Chow Hsu; John Kornak; Shoujun Zhao; Fergus V Coakley
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 10.  Molecular fingerprinting of radiation resistant tumors: can we apprehend and rehabilitate the suspects?

Authors:  Charles J Rosser; Micah Gaar; Stacy Porvasnik
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.