Literature DB >> 12375296

A simple confidence interval for meta-analysis.

Kurex Sidik1, Jeffrey N Jonkman.   

Abstract

In the context of a random effects model for meta-analysis, a number of methods are available to estimate confidence limits for the overall mean effect. A simple and commonly used method is the DerSimonian and Laird approach. This paper discusses an alternative simple approach for constructing the confidence interval, based on the t-distribution. This approach has improved coverage probability compared to the DerSimonian and Laird method. Moreover, it is easy to calculate, and unlike some methods suggested in the statistical literature, no iterative computation is required. Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12375296     DOI: 10.1002/sim.1262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  63 in total

1.  Outcomes for medicaid clients with substance abuse problems before and after managed care.

Authors:  Bentson H McFarland; Dennis D Deck; Lynn E McCamant; Roy M Gabriel; Douglas A Bigelow
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2005 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.505

2.  Timing and Characteristics of Cumulative Evidence Available on Novel Therapeutic Agents Receiving Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approval.

Authors:  Huseyin Naci; Olivier J Wouters; Radhika Gupta; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Risk Factors for Lower Limb Injury in Female Team Field and Court Sports: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Best Evidence Synthesis.

Authors:  Tyler J Collings; Matthew N Bourne; Rod S Barrett; William du Moulin; Jack T Hickey; Laura E Diamond
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Internet interventions for mental health in university students: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mathias Harrer; Sophia H Adam; Harald Baumeister; Pim Cuijpers; Eirini Karyotaki; Randy P Auerbach; Ronald C Kessler; Ronny Bruffaerts; Matthias Berking; David D Ebert
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 4.035

5.  On random-effects meta-analysis.

Authors:  D Zeng; D Y Lin
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 2.445

6.  Effectiveness of probiotics and synbiotics in reducing duration of acute infectious diarrhea in pediatric patients in developed countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Loukia Vassilopoulou; Panagiota Spyromitrou-Xioufi; Fani Ladomenou
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 3.183

7.  NONPARAMETRIC INFERENCE PROCEDURE FOR PERCENTILES OF THE RANDOM EFFECTS DISTRIBUTION IN META-ANALYSIS.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Lu Tian; Tianxi Cai; L J Wei
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.083

8.  On evidence cycles in network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lifeng Lin; Haitao Chu; James S Hodges
Journal:  Stat Interface       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 0.582

9.  Evaluation of various estimators for standardized mean difference in meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lifeng Lin; Ariel M Aloe
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  The role of orthographic neighbourhood effects in lateralized lexical decision: a replication study and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Adam J Parker; Ciara Egan; Jack H Grant; Sophie Harte; Brad T Hudson; Zoe V J Woodhead
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.