Literature DB >> 12374428

Modular organization of spinal motor systems.

E Bizzi1, A D'Avella, P Saltiel, M Tresch.   

Abstract

The vertebrate nervous system produces a wide range of movement flexibly and efficiently, even though the simplest of these movements is potentially highly complex. The strategies by which the nervous system overcomes these complexities have therefore been of interest to motor physiologists for decades. In this review, the authors present a number of recent experiments that propose one strategy by which the nervous system might simplify the production of movement. These experiments suggest that spinal motor systems are organized in terms of a small number of distinct motor responses, or "modules." These distinct modules can be combined together simply to produce a wide range of different movements. Such a modular organization of spinal motor systems can potentially allow the nervous system to produce a wide range of natural behaviors in a simple and flexible manner.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12374428     DOI: 10.1177/107385802236969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscientist        ISSN: 1073-8584            Impact factor:   7.519


  29 in total

1.  Motoneuronal and muscle synergies involved in cat hindlimb control during fictive and real locomotion: a comparison study.

Authors:  Sergey N Markin; Michel A Lemay; Boris I Prilutsky; Ilya A Rybak
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Shared and specific muscle synergies in natural motor behaviors.

Authors:  Andrea d'Avella; Emilio Bizzi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Control of visually guided behavior by distinct populations of spinal projection neurons.

Authors:  Michael B Orger; Adam R Kampff; Kristen E Severi; Johann H Bollmann; Florian Engert
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Modularity of endpoint force patterns evoked using intraspinal microstimulation in treadmill trained and/or neurotrophin-treated chronic spinal cats.

Authors:  Vanessa S Boyce; Michel A Lemay
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Interaction of involuntary post-contraction activity with locomotor movements.

Authors:  Y P Ivanenko; W G Wright; V S Gurfinkel; F Horak; P Cordo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Motor outputs in a multitasking network: relative contributions of inputs and experience-dependent network states.

Authors:  Allyson K Friedman; Yuriy Zhurov; Bjoern Ch Ludwar; Klaudiusz R Weiss
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Loss of motor function in preclinical Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Aron S Buchman; David A Bennett
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.618

8.  Bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation enhances effector-independent representations of motor synergy and sequence learning.

Authors:  Sheena Waters-Metenier; Masud Husain; Tobias Wiestler; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Hindlimb endpoint forces predict movement direction evoked by intraspinal microstimulation in cats.

Authors:  Michel A Lemay; Dane Grasse; Warren M Grill
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 10.  The case for and against muscle synergies.

Authors:  Matthew C Tresch; Anthony Jarc
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 6.627

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.