Literature DB >> 12368634

Nasopharyngectomy for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a review of 31 patients and prognostic factors.

Edward W H To1, Eric C H Lai, Jack H H Cheng, Peter C W Pang, Michael D Williams, Peter M L Teo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Nasopharyngectomy is a well-established treatment option for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Over a period of 4 years and 3 months, in a total of 43 patients, 45 nasopharyngectomies were performed. Thirty-one patients with follow-up ranging from 12 to 58 months were studied. Twenty-two patients (58%) survived; of these, 18 patients (82%) remained disease free. All patients who developed repeat recurrence or died (n = 12) had a high recurrent T-stage tumor, skull base involvement, multiple recurrences, positive surgical margins, or concurrent neck node metastasis. These factors are poor prognostic parameters and might mitigate the indications for aggressive salvage surgery. However, low recurrent T-stage tumor without neck metastasis carries a good prognosis. Modern minimally invasive surgery carries minimal morbidity. STUDY DESIGN A retrospective study was made to determine prognostic indicators in patients treated with salvage surgery for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
METHODS: Medical records were analyzed for all patients who had received nasopharyngectomy for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma from March 1997 to June 2001. They were followed up from March 1997 to January 2002. Recurrent T stage, nodal metastasis, surgical approach, surgical margins, and pathological nodal status, together with surgical mortality, morbidity, and the delivery of postoperative irradiation, were compared with survival.
RESULTS: In all, 43 patients underwent 45 nasopharyngectomies over a period of 4 years and 3 months. Patients with less than 1 year of follow-up were excluded. Four patients with residual disease, who represent a more favorable group, and five patients with planned debulking, nasopharyngectomy, and postoperative stereotactic irradiation were also excluded. The study group comprised 25 men and 6 women (ratio of 4:1) with age ranging from 26 to 69 years (mean age, 49.5 y). In 28 patients (90.3%), the recurrence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma was their first recurrence; in 3 patients (9.7%), the recurrences were second recurrences. Twenty-two patients (71%) survived, achieving a mean survival of 28.5 months. Nine patients died with a mean interval of 7.8 months (range, 1-14 mo). Of the nine patients who died, six (67%) had T3 or T4 tumor, four (44.4%) had concurrent recurrent neck disease, and five (55.5%) had positive surgical margins. Two patients died of perioperative meningitis. Fifteen (83.3%) of the 18 disease-free survivors had a low recurrent T-stage tumor. Mean intervals for development of repeat recurrence or distant metastasis were 16 and 7.9 months, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: High recurrent T stage, skull base involvement, repeated recurrence before surgery, nodal metastasis, and positive surgical margins carry a poor prognosis. This is particularly evident with high T stage and concurrent nodal metastasis. However, patients with low T stage have a survival advantage and benefit most from surgical treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12368634     DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200210000-00033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  6 in total

1.  Anterior skull base surgery.

Authors:  Moni Abraham Kuriakose; Nirav P Trivedi; Vikram Kekatpure
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-11-21

2.  A retrospective study of salvage surgery for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Xue Bian; Hui Chen; Lianming Liao
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Salvage endoscopic nasopharyngectomy for local recurrent or residual nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a 10-year experience.

Authors:  Juan Liu; Huapeng Yu; Xicai Sun; Dehui Wang; Yurong Gu; Quan Liu; Huan Wang; Wade Han; Allison Fry
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Current treatment options for recurrent nasopharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Carlos Suárez; Juan P Rodrigo; Alessandra Rinaldo; Johannes A Langendijk; Ashok R Shaha; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 5.  Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Cancer: Critical Review of Local Treatment Options Including Recommendations during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Michaela Svajdova; Marian Sicak; Pavol Dubinsky; Marek Slavik; Pavel Slampa; Tomas Kazda
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Ling-Long Tang; Yu-Pei Chen; Chuan-Ben Chen; Ming-Yuan Chen; Nian-Yong Chen; Xiao-Zhong Chen; Xiao-Jing Du; Wen-Feng Fang; Mei Feng; Jin Gao; Fei Han; Xia He; Chao-Su Hu; De-Sheng Hu; Guang-Yuan Hu; Hao Jiang; Wei Jiang; Feng Jin; Jin-Yi Lang; Jin-Gao Li; Shao-Jun Lin; Xu Liu; Qiu-Fang Liu; Lin Ma; Hai-Qiang Mai; Ji-Yong Qin; Liang-Fang Shen; Ying Sun; Pei-Guo Wang; Ren-Sheng Wang; Ruo-Zheng Wang; Xiao-Shen Wang; Ying Wang; Hui Wu; Yun-Fei Xia; Shao-Wen Xiao; Kun-Yu Yang; Jun-Lin Yi; Xiao-Dong Zhu; Jun Ma
Journal:  Cancer Commun (Lond)       Date:  2021-10-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.