Literature DB >> 12367532

Bovine pancreatic polypeptide (bPP) undergoes significant changes in conformation and dynamics upon binding to DPC micelles.

Mirjam Lerch1, Verena Gafner, Reto Bader, Barbara Christen, Gerd Folkers, Oliver Zerbe.   

Abstract

The pancreatic polypeptide (PP), a 36-residue, C-terminally amidated polypeptide hormone is a member of the neuropeptide Y (NPY) family. Here, we have studied the structure and dynamics of bovine pancreatic polypeptide (bPP) when bound to DPC-micelles as a membrane-mimicking model as well as the dynamics of bPP in solution. The comparison of structure and dynamics of bPP in both states reveals remarkable differences. The overall correlation time of 5.08ns derived from the 15N relaxation data proves unambiguously that bPP in solution exists as a dimer. Therein, intermolecular as well as intramolecular hydrophobic interactions from residues of both the amphiphilic helix and of the back-folded N terminus contribute to the stability of the PP fold. The overall rigidity is well-reflected in positive values for the heteronuclear NOE for residues 4-34. The membrane-bound species displays a partitioning into a more flexible N-terminal region and a well-defined alpha-helical region comprising residues 17-31. The average RMSD value for residues 17-31 is 0.22(+/-0.09)A. The flexibility of the N terminus is compatible with negative values of the heteronuclear NOE observed for the N-terminal residues 4-12 and low values of the generalized order parameter S(2). The membrane-peptide interface was investigated by micelle-integrating spin-labels and H,2H exchange measurements. It is formed by those residues which make contacts between the C-terminal alpha-helix and the polyproline helix. In contrast to pNPY, also residues from the N terminus display spatial proximity to the membrane interface. Furthermore, the orientation of the C terminus, that presumably contains residues involved in receptor binding, is different in the two environments. We speculate that this pre-positioning of residues could be an important requirement for receptor activation. Moreover, we doubt that the PP fold is of functional relevance for binding at the Y(4) receptor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12367532     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00889-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  8 in total

Review 1.  Membrane catalysis of peptide-receptor binding.

Authors:  David N Langelaan; Jan K Rainey
Journal:  Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.626

2.  Position and length of fatty acids strongly affect receptor selectivity pattern of human pancreatic polypeptide analogues.

Authors:  Veronika Mäde; Kathrin Bellmann-Sickert; Anette Kaiser; Jens Meiler; Annette G Beck-Sickinger
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 3.  Protein design: toward functional metalloenzymes.

Authors:  Fangting Yu; Virginia M Cangelosi; Melissa L Zastrow; Matteo Tegoni; Jefferson S Plegaria; Alison G Tebo; Catherine S Mocny; Leela Ruckthong; Hira Qayyum; Vincent L Pecoraro
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Human pancreatic polypeptide in a phospholipid-based micellar formulation.

Authors:  Amrita Banerjee; Hayat Onyuksel
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Non-specific binding and general cross-reactivity of Y receptor agonists are correlated and should importantly depend on their acidic sectors.

Authors:  M S Parker; R Sah; A Balasubramaniam; F R Sallee; O Zerbe; S L Parker
Journal:  Peptides       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 3.750

6.  High molecular weight PEGylation of human pancreatic polypeptide at position 22 improves stability and reduces food intake in mice.

Authors:  V Thieme; N Jolly; A N Madsen; K Bellmann-Sickert; T W Schwartz; B Holst; H M Cox; A G Beck-Sickinger
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 8.739

7.  Pancreatic polypeptide is recognized by two hydrophobic domains of the human Y4 receptor binding pocket.

Authors:  Xavier Pedragosa-Badia; Gregory R Sliwoski; Elizabeth Dong Nguyen; Diana Lindner; Jan Stichel; Kristian W Kaufmann; Jens Meiler; Annette G Beck-Sickinger
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Understanding GPCR Recognition and Folding from NMR Studies of Fragments.

Authors:  Jacopo Marino; Reto Walser; Martin Poms; Oliver Zerbe
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 4.036

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.