Literature DB >> 12364809

Overview of biomarkers and surrogate endpoints in drug development.

John A Wagner1.   

Abstract

There are numerous factors that recommend the use of biomarkers in drug development including the ability to provide a rational basis for selection of lead compounds, as an aid in determining or refining mechanism of action or pathophysiology, and the ability to work towards qualification and use of a biomarker as a surrogate endpoint. Examples of biomarkers come from many different means of clinical and laboratory measurement. Total cholesterol is an example of a clinically useful biomarker that was successfully qualified for use as a surrogate endpoint. Biomarkers require validation in most circumstances. Validation of biomarker assays is a necessary component to delivery of high-quality research data necessary for effective use of biomarkers. Qualification is necessary for use of a biomarker as a surrogate endpoint. Putative biomarkers are typically identified because of a relationship to known or hypothetical steps in a pathophysiologic cascade. Biomarker discovery can also be effected by expression profiling experiment using a variety of array technologies and related methods. For example, expression profiling experiments enabled the discovery of adipocyte related complement protein of 30 kD (Acrp30 or adiponectin) as a biomarker for in vivo activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) gamma activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12364809      PMCID: PMC3851644          DOI: 10.1155/2002/929274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Markers        ISSN: 0278-0240            Impact factor:   3.434


  32 in total

1.  Molecular staging estimates occult tumor burden in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Alex Mejia; Stephanie Schulz; Terry Hyslop; David S Weinberg; Scott A Waldman
Journal:  Adv Clin Chem       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 5.394

Review 2.  Biomarkers in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Gabor G Illei; Peter E Lipsky
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  Fit-for-purpose method development and validation for successful biomarker measurement.

Authors:  Jean W Lee; Viswanath Devanarayan; Yu Chen Barrett; Russell Weiner; John Allinson; Scott Fountain; Stephen Keller; Ira Weinryb; Marie Green; Larry Duan; James A Rogers; Robert Millham; Peter J O'Brien; Jeff Sailstad; Masood Khan; Chad Ray; John A Wagner
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 4.  Biomarker method validation in anticancer drug development.

Authors:  J Cummings; T H Ward; A Greystoke; M Ranson; C Dive
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 5.  The promise and reality of pharmacogenetics in psychiatry.

Authors:  Peter P Zandi; Jennifer T Judy
Journal:  Psychiatr Clin North Am       Date:  2010-03

Review 6.  Proteomics and biomarkers in clinical trials for drug development.

Authors:  Jung-min Lee; Jasmine J Han; Gary Altwerger; Elise C Kohn
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 7.  Molecular staging individualizing cancer management.

Authors:  Alex Mejia; Stephanie Schulz; Terry Hyslop; David S Weinberg; Scott A Waldman
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 3.454

8.  More sound cancer therapy biomarker development with active noise control.

Authors:  Michael L Maitland
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-03-13

Review 9.  GUCY2C molecular staging personalizes colorectal cancer patient management.

Authors:  Jian P Gong; Stephanie Schulz; Terry Hyslop; Scott A Waldman
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.851

Review 10.  Validation of analytic methods for biomarkers used in drug development.

Authors:  Cindy H Chau; Olivier Rixe; Howard McLeod; William D Figg
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.